[2014]

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

Why are you comparing a comedy to a big-budget, heavily promoted original story Disney film? Why don't you compare Maleficent to Frozen, which is a much fairer comparison?

When someone has to bring up the highest grossing animated film of all time just cuz it was also made by Disney and also had a high budget, you know they lost the argument !

The fear is real !

Either way, Maleficent is in Disney's top 5 biggest films of all time, while We're The Millers isn't even in the top 50 biggest comedies of all time.

[ciara]

Are you kidding?


Angelina has MULTIPLE, which have already been listed...

[RoarRiteNow1]

Originally posted by 2014

When someone has to bring up the highest grossing animated film of all time just cuz it was also made by Disney and also had a high budget, you know they lost the argument !

The fear is real !

Either way, Maleficent is in Disney's top 5 biggest films of all time, while We're The Millers isn't even in the top 50 biggest comedies of all time.

It's a fairer comparison than against a comedy when comedies don't gross as much as Disney films usually

[Mau ®]

It must suck to know that Aniston's career to this day is due to one role in a TV series while Angie's career is based on actual talent evident on the praise awarded to several of her roles (even one with an Oscar!) as well as her PRESTIGIOUS humanitarian work around the world.

[RoarRiteNow1]

Originally posted by Mau ®

It must suck to know that Aniston's career to this day is due to one role in a TV series while Angie's career is based on actual talent evident on the praise awarded to several of her roles (even one with an Oscar!) as well as her PRESTIGIOUS humanitarian work around the world.

Shame she doesn't have any classics though, but congrats to her for her humanitarian work!

[Bríseis]

Originally posted by Mau ®

It must suck to know that Aniston's career to this day is due to one role in a TV series while Angie's career is based on actual talent evident on the praise awarded to several of her roles (even one with an Oscar!) as well as her PRESTIGIOUS humanitarian work around the world.

Yeah, prestigious, what a perfect word choice

[Thomasuxx]

Lara Croft

But she's already iconic on her own, she doesn't need an iconic role

[taylor__fan]

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

That's because most of Angelina's films are big-budget heavily promoted Dreamworks/Disney films. Gross isn't everything either, for example Sky Captain grossed 58 million but had a 70 million budget. So even though it grossed over 50 million it was still a colossal flop. The same can be said about every non-Dreamworks/Disney Angelina film except like 5 or 6.

The roles yall are calling iconic are like the only successful films she has that aren't Dreamworks/Disney

So is it a bad thing that big studios are interested in you now? Why doesn't any big studio call Jennifer?

Because she is stacked in doing the same rol in romantic comedies forever. They contract her to do the exact same thing she did in friends for 10 year.

Like the 80% of her yearly earnings are form friends while angelina earned more money for her maleficient role than jennifer"s last movie whole budget

[Schhh]

Not people saying Salt.

Lara Croft was a commercial failure tho, considering the budget, especially the second movie.

[2014]

Originally posted by Schhh

Not people saying Salt.

Lara Croft was a commercial failure tho, considering the budget, especially the second movie.

First movie :

Budget : $115M
Box office : $274M

Second movie:

Budget : $95M
Box office : $156M

Sorry, neither was a "commercial failure". The 2nd was a disappointment for sure, but not a failure.

She was prasied for her performance and her role is iconic, that's all that matters !

[RoarRiteNow1]

Originally posted by taylor__fan

So is it a bad thing that big studios are interested in you now? Why doesn't any big studio call Jennifer?

Because she is stacked in doing the same rol in romantic comedies forever. They contract her to do the exact same thing she did in friends for 10 year.

Like the 80% of her yearly earnings are form friends while angelina earned more money for her maleficient role than jennifer"s last movie whole budget

Cool. Funny she still didn't make Forbes though after Maleficent



And @2014 the 2nd Tomb Raider movie was a flop

[Artemisia]

not yall claiming salt is an iconic role, wtf? who even checks for that movie anymore?

[Artemisia]

the more i think about it, the more clear it becomes that she doesn't have a single iconic role she is known for.

[TinkerbellClap]

She will be remembered for her involvement in many amazing movies that do not go to dvd a day after being released in cinemas.

[RoarRiteNow1]

Originally posted by Artemisia

the more i think about it, the more clear it becomes that she doesn't have a single iconic role she is known for.

I guess the main thing she's known for is her husband and the means in which she acquired him

[Artemisia]

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

I guess the main thing she's known for is her husband and the means in which she acquired him

Indeed. When I think of Angelina Jolie, her husband immediately comes to mind, not any specific role.

[taylor__fan]

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

Cool. Funny she still didn't make Forbes though after Maleficent



And @2014 the 2nd Tomb Raider movie was a flop

But Angelina was the best paid actress of 2014
And you call the 2nd tomb raider movie a flop when grossed 100M more than its production budget
Then all Jennifer aniston movies are flops except 5-6

Seriously Angelina won, she won the man, she is younger (so achieved more than Aniston in less time), she is the bigger star, and the iconic actress
Friends and Rachel are iconic, Jennifer isn't

[taylor__fan]

I really don't get how is it for you better to be remembered by one rol, than by your career

[CandyBling]

her celebrity is bigger than any of her roles tbh

[phreshprince]

GIRL INTERRUPTED HELLO PEOPLE!