I think Gaga, since she have a lot of fans around the world! And fans speak louder than receipts. And when I was lurking here, I've read a comment that "I've rather have 100 loyal buyers than to have 1000 buyers that can fly anytime" (Not like this but the message was the same)
I think you missed my point, I was trying to get across that they're willing to go to a concert based on the fact "they're a good performer". Not because of their music, they like them or not or even because they stan for the artists.
If you want to base it on net-worth than Gaga must be more 'global' than a lot of top tier legends, and to suggest that would be ludicrous. Gaga has obviously done more buisiness ventures and endorsements than Katy, in the end she is still a musician like Katy and wants to promote her albums and singles worldwide, and is she winning in that field?
I only brought up Gaga's networth because you brought up receipts. You do know business endorsements do contribute as well? They get exposure. Your paragraph doesn't even answer OP's question. Go start your own thread of "Who's era is more successful when it comes to singles worldwide?" and then MAYBE you can talk... I'm done talking to you about this. Please don't reply to me.
the one that was the most liked person on fb ,on twitter , on google +
had the most viewed video in youtube and was the most viewed person
her best selling albums and singles are way above the other childish girl
most talked person also
have 2 concerts in top 30 of all time best selling concerts
the one that was the most liked person on fb ,on twitter , on google +
had the most viewed video in youtube and was the most viewed person
her best selling albums and singles are way above the other childish girl
most talked person also
have 2 concerts in top 30 of all time best selling concerts
and actually can sing
But men and women globally want to **** Katy, no one wants gags.
I only brought up Gaga's networth because you brought up receipts. You do know business endorsements do contribute as well? They get exposure. Your paragraph doesn't even answer OP's question. Go start your own thread of "Who's era is more successful when it comes to singles worldwide?" and then MAYBE you can talk... I'm done talking to you about this. Please don't reply to me.
If Katy and Gaga are both remembered 50 years from now, do you honestly think people will care about their endorsements? No, it will be MUSIC. So your 'receipts' don't really counter mine at all.
Anyway, i remember this being asked all the time in 2012 and Gaga won by a landslide, Katy didn't even get half of Gaga's votes usually, how things are changing
Anyway, i remember this being asked all the time in 2012 and Gaga won by a landslide, Katy didn't even get half of Gaga's votes usually, how things are changing
The answer is still Gaga.
Her WW accomplishments will not go away, and they are far more impressive than Katy's WW accomplishments. Katy practically has her beat in the U.S. though.
Her WW accomplishments will not go away, and they are far more impressive than Katy's WW accomplishments. Katy practically has her beat in the U.S. though.
What if Gaga flops again next era? And the era after that? Meanwhile Katy keeps going up and up, my point is if that scenario were to happen then comments like "it's still Gaga' are going to seem stale, and based on this thread and the change in votes they are already starting to be stale, and i don't see Gaga coming back tbh because of how much she's tarnished her image, but oh well lets see what happens.