Quote:
Originally posted by Javan
As I was saying. We can't comprehend the tone of her post. For all we know, it could be the same scenario, when someone would call another woman "that bitch", changing the definition from defining women as a whole in addition to only recognizing women who have power, who are incontrol of their life and proud of it. Turning a negative sexist word into something positive. How do we know this aint Azealias intent. Why do we assume it wasn't? Because she an angry black girl. That is all.
![](http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/354/1/b/natasha_applies_make_up_by_jaaron24-d5oltjb.gif)
|
ST0P.
we see clear as day what her tone is. she hates Perez and he hates her right back. you think they're giggling over this?
she just bought into the anti-fem stigma as well, there is no need for figuring out her "tone" in this matter.
on top of that, your "a girl calling a girl 'that bitch'" is completely different based on the fact that what you just described is two girls. In this case it is a gay man getting insulted with a derogatory term by a woman who cannot quality as a f@g herself (based on her definition).
it's more the equivalent of a man calling a woman the C word that rhymes with "runt" and then coming up with his own definition. "oh, not
those types of girls, only the ones with short hair & small boobs." you think he would get a pass?
I really hope you're just ****ing around at this point and taking the piss because you're coming off as bad & incoherent as Azealia is.
![](http://i.minus.com/iwSjr9xbywO6Z.gif)