Quote:
Originally posted by ♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚
Did you not read the link Bang Up posted where it says only about 100 tickets are being sold at a low price? She's selling THOUSANDS of tickets for each show and if you think she's losing a lot when only a hundred of tickets are being sold at low prices for ONE venue then you're just hating blindly and kinda embarrassing yourself.
|
Sis did
YOU read the OP and then bang up's response?
The OP's article is dated November 5th, Bang up checked the site, today. The whole point of them being priced like coffee is so they sell. It stands to reason that by the time forbes edited this and published this + one day ahead when bang up checked, they had sold a fair amount.
So bang up does try to drag but under any kind of scrutiny, it falls to pieces.
Now, She does indeed loose out on ticket sales even though it's the secondary Market. Why? Because in Europe ticket agencies only release a select number of tickets to be sold to the public they then move the remainder over to secondary sellers for sale at triple the price if the artist is in demand. If an artist is not, this very issue that's happening occurs.
Don't take my word for it though, Ticket agencies have been doing this for quite a long time especially in Europe and the US:
In1995:
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/06/ar...stigation.html
in 2009:
http://www.billboard.com/biz/article...ter-complaints
In 2012:
http://www.ticketnews.com/news/ticke...tions111214852
Also again last year 2013 they were investigated.
So you see Prince High, what happens is, the created a artificial "sell out" and then moved thousands of tickets that they had over to the secondary company that they own and attempted to sell them at double and triple the price, but it backfired because the demand wasn't there. So she does, lose money which you'll notice in the gross.
It's great bang up provided that list, all it says is loads of people bough tickets between when forbes checked and when he checked.
I do need to correct forbes on one thing though. Rolling Stone retracted calling gaga queen of pop in 2011 as it was discovered they manipulated votes.
Quote:
To say that Madonna won this poll in a landslide would be like saying that she was a kind of popular pop singer in the 1980s. It wouldn't even begin to explain the scope of the situation. She received five times as many votes as Lady Gaga, who landed in second place by a very comfortable margin.
|
- Rolling stone 2011.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pi...adonna-0325148