[Hollister_Sam]

Originally posted by dussymob

That was boring though.

not true, not at all. California Gurls was like 6 weeks? LTWYL 7 weeks. Rude Boy 5 weeks. Tik Tok 10 weeks. There has been a few to last a long time.. just now so many songs are released by popular artists...

[Beatz]

Originally posted by Hollister_Sam

not true, not at all. California Gurls was like 6 weeks? LTWYL 7 weeks. Rude Boy 5 weeks. Tik Tok 10 weeks. There has been a few to last a long time.. just now so many songs are released by popular artists...

´
Tik Tok was 9 weeks

IMO it's better to have more #1s in a while, that way makes the charts more interesting and it actually means there's more competition.

[Rico Shameless v2]

Originally posted by deemy

Katy will never be able get a 2 month old and 3 day single reached #1 though and have it go to number one after the 2nd single already done did it.

Why would she need to when all her singles have been going #1 in appropriate order? The one thing you stans complained about "OG" not going #1 for the last 2 months. It only got there because competition got weak as well, even though I like it now and glad it got there finally. But, what "OG" is an impressive feat, though it's not something that artists will fight to achieve. #fail.

[Hollister_Sam]

Originally posted by Rico Shameless v2

Why would she need to when all her singles have been going #1 in appropriate order? The one thing you stans complained about "OG" not going #1 for the last 2 months. It only got there because competition got weak as well, even though I like it now and glad it got there finally. But, what "OG" is an impressive feat, though it's not something that artists will fight to achieve. #fail.

You know that's bs.. in the end you know what's going to matter the most? not how she got to #1, but how many #1's she has!! RiRi, can't deny any of her success. Not denying katy's she's had a great year!

[Rico Shameless v2]

Originally posted by Hollister_Sam

You know that's bs.. in the end you know what's going to matter the most? not how she got to #1, but how many #1's she has!! RiRi, can't deny any of her success. Not denying katy's she's had a great year!

I don't know what you're talking about. I'm not denying her success. I'm just saying it's stupid to attack Katy because she didn't go #1 with her first single after the second. That's the most ridiculous thing to say.

[Hollister_Sam]

Originally posted by Rico Shameless v2

I don't know what you're talking about. I'm not denying her success. I'm just saying it's stupid to attack Katy because she didn't go #1 with her first single after the second. That's the most ridiculous thing to say.

I understand, I never attacked Katy, I just tried to get everyone to calm down about all this katy vs rihanna. they both deserve the spotlight, they are amazing!!

[Deemy]

Originally posted by Rico Shameless v2

I don't know what you're talking about. I'm not denying her success. I'm just saying it's stupid to attack Katy because she didn't go #1 with her first single after the second. That's the most ridiculous thing to say.

I was just posting a piece of history. But even if she released 2 singles at a time could she? Could it stay in the top 10 on BB for mover 2 months? We dont know.

[Rico Shameless v2]

Originally posted by deemy

I was just posting a piece of history. But even if she released 2 singles at a time could she? Could it stay in the top 10 on BB for mover 2 months? We dont know.

"Even if". Who knows? What we know is she has gotten two huge solo singles this year to #1, and a third one on the way. What we know is "Cali Gurls" holds the Pop radio spin record, spent 6 weeks at #1, and has sold 4.1 million copies. (compared to another with similar and barely past 2 million). We know these songs have all had huge longevity. You can't attack her just because her #1 singles are going #1 at the time they were supposed to. That's a stupid and ignorant concept, sorry.

[Deemy]

Originally posted by Rico Shameless v2

"Even if". Who knows? What we know is she has gotten two huge solo singles this year to #1, and a third one on the way. What we know is "Cali Gurls" holds the Pop radio spin record, spent 6 weeks at #1, and has sold 4.1 million copies. We know these songs have all had huge longevity. You can't attack her just because her #1 singles are going #1 at the time they were supposed to.

I was not attacking her. Did you read what the other posters was talking about prior my post. They were basically saying that ih's #1s arent not that significant because Drake helped her get WMN to #1 and all of that. My remark about the 2 months thing is indeed notable because with today's radio stations and charts, these singles they come and they go. Just like that. the fact that Rih was able to hold down the top 5 for so long for 2 months while she had another major hit on radio sharing the same format - katy never had that issue as her singles were drawn out. That was the point I was trying to highlight that's significant. Not belittle Katy's singles success.

[Mixirox2727]

Seriously, if you're gonna attack someone....take it to the NHB thread....NOT the charts thread.....

[Hollister_Sam]

Originally posted by deemy

I was not attacking her. Did you read what the other posters was talking about prior my post. They were basically saying that ih's #1s arent not that significant because Drake helped her get WMN to #1 and all of that. My remark about the 2 months thing is indeed notable because with today's radio stations and charts, these singles they come and they go. Just like that. the fact that Rih was able to hold down the top 5 for so long for 2 months while she had another major hit on radio sharing the same format - katy never had that issue as her singles were drawn out. That was the point I was trying to highlight that's significant. Not belittle Katy's singles success.

I agree with you, hands down!!

[Rico Shameless v2]

Originally posted by deemy

I was not attacking her. Did you read what the other posters was talking about prior my post. They were basically saying that ih's #1s arent not that significant because Drake helped her get WMN to #1 and all of that. My remark about the 2 months thing is indeed notable because with today's radio stations and charts, these singles they come and they go. Just like that. the fact that Rih was able to hold down the top 5 for so long for 2 months while she had another major hit on radio sharing the same format - katy never had that issue as her singles were drawn out. That was the point I was trying to highlight that's significant. Not belittle Katy's singles success.

I don't think its notable in the sense that "WMN?" has Urban/Rhythmic support because of its sound, and Drake does help. My Hip-Hop/R&B station plays the version with him on it 24/7. The Drake-less version plays on the Pop stations I listen to that don't play rap. Anywho, if it were only released to Pop, your stance on how songs come and go would apply to "WMN?" and it wouldn't have gone #1 so quickly if it only had 1 format like "OG" did.

Originally posted by Mixirox2727

Seriously, if you're gonna attack someone....take it to the NHB thread....NOT the charts thread.....

Who's attacking anyone?

[FAN]

Originally posted by deemy

BTW S&M is being released as the 3rd single off Loud. Rihanna can get her 3rd consecutive #1 as the LEAD artist as well.

Katy will never be able get a 2 month old and 3 day single reached #1 though and have it go to number one after the 2nd single already done did it.

1) split singles are harder to reach number one

2) Katy doesn't release the 2nd single a month after the first in desperation for album sales.

Girl bye!

[RihMark]

Originally posted by Rico Shameless v2

I don't think its notable in the sense that "WMN?" has Urban/Rhythmic support because of its sound, and Drake does help. My Hip-Hop/R&B station plays the version with him on it 24/7. The Drake-less version plays on the Pop stations I listen to that don't play rap. Anywho, if it were only released to Pop, your stance on how songs come and go would apply to "WMN?" and it wouldn't have gone #1 so quickly if it only had 1 format like "OG" did.



Who's attacking anyone?

Drake is on the version every station plays
I havent heard of any station playing just Rihanna "Whats My Name"

[Nadia]

Originally posted by Rihannafan

1) split singles are harder to reach number one

2) Katy doesn't release the 2nd single a month after the first in desperation for album sales.

Girl bye!

Katy fans shouldn't say anything about albums sales

Loud already sold half of TD u.s total in 2 weeks

Bye

[pabloanxiety]

Originally posted by Nadia

Katy fans shouldn't say anything about albums sales

Isn't Rihannafan a Rihanna fan? Confused

[Nadia]

Originally posted by pabloanxiety

Isn't Rihannafan a Rihanna fan? Confused

he/she say so but idk

[Rico Shameless v2]

Originally posted by rihannar0x8

Drake is on the version every station plays
I havent heard of any station playing just Rihanna "Whats My Name"

Because you listen to every station in the whole United States of America? Wipe that grin off your face and hush! Q100 and Star94FM in Atlanta play the versions WITHOUT Drake, as do many Pop stations who use solo versions of songs. That's why they are made, Sherlock.

[Deemy]

Originally posted by pabloanxiety

Isn't Rihannafan a Rihanna fan? Confused

No he hates rihanna. Hes a troll.

[MusicTalker]

Originally posted by Rihannafan

1) split singles are harder to reach number one

2) Katy doesn't release the 2nd single a month after the first in desperation for album sales.

Girl bye!

The iTunes thread & now this... when did you lose Rihanna?