[Bicassie]

Originally posted by Matthew

So The Guardian is going to bring it down further :/

this post :/

[Rihlana]

Originally posted by simmnfierzig

How would a 60 bring a 58 down. Stay in school kids

I hope the reviewers who will give this 80+ are the ones who are still looking for their wigs and haven't had time to write a review.

[lilrobomonster]

Originally posted by Matthew

So The Guardian is going to bring it down further :/

Maybe not. It's a 60, which is ever so slightly higer than the current score. Depending on the weighting process, it'll probably lift it a point, but make it so higher scores in the future do less to raise the score.

[JEWRJEWR]

Originally posted by Rihlana

I hope the reviewers who will give this 80+ are the ones who are still looking for their wigs and haven't had time to write a review.

or maybe the serious publications that wouldnt write a review based off a leak...

[Coklek92]

I swear if this ends up with 61 Metascore

61 ha curse is real tho

[Matthew]

Oh, calm down people I haven't had my coffee yet

[One Nation]

The Guardian should bring it up to a 59

[Rihlana]

Originally posted by Matthew

Oh, calm down people I haven't had my coffee yet

The lashings over a simple oversight

[PopFan]

Originally posted by Coklek92

I swear if this ends up with 61 Metascore

61 ha curse is real tho

It won't. It will end up at 65-70 most likely which is average to decent. 7 and 8 are coming.

[romonster]

Originally posted by BlondUnicorn

So, is Lady Gaga’s new album Joanne any good? A track-by-track review
80 by Metro

Lady Gaga's new album Joanne reviewed: is it any good, then?
80 by Digital Spy

They don't count for Metacritic, though.

Of course these ones don't count but the completely shameless score of 40 by NYTimes does

[lilrobomonster]

I don't get it. The guardian review is mostly positive until the last 1.5 sentences. Reading the review up until that you'd think it was a 4/5

[PopFan]

Originally posted by romonster

Of course these ones don't count but the completely shameless score of 40 by NYTimes does

Well, it's the same for everyone. And those critics tend to be more generous than the others.

[One Nation]

Originally posted by romonster

Of course these ones don't count but the completely shameless score of 40 by NYTimes does

It happens to the best of em' dear

[Matangi]

Originally posted by ♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚

Interesting how all those that don't count are giving it such great scored. Inb4 "terrible publications and reviews!1! "

Yes sis its all part of the plan! The conspiracy theories are coming

[Navyofbadgals]

Originally posted by ♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚

Interesting how all those that don't count are giving it such great scored. Inb4 "terrible publications and reviews!1! "

this is messy

[One Nation]

Originally posted by Matangi

Yes sis its all part of the plan! The conspiracy theories are coming

Like..

[Bicassie]

80 pages for some reviews of a bad album
The entertaintment value of it all........is just.......

[heartbeats]

Originally posted by ♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚

Interesting how all those that don't count are giving it such great scored. Inb4 "terrible publications and reviews!1! "

oh honey

[robotdanger]

The HDD thread just may break the internet.

[simmnfierzig]

Originally posted by JEWRJEWR

or maybe the serious publications that wouldnt write a review based off a leak...

There is 100% no review based on a leak. They just heard / got the album early.