|
Tournament: The 1st ATRL Hunger Games: THE AWARDS
Member Since: 5/1/2007
Posts: 15,659
|
So I'm gonna give a forum to
helloDer, ethan, stereo.love, crazytowel, boyonce
In The Mockingyous forum only fiercE will be left (For now)
And in the Alliance 3 forum only Razzle will be left.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/11/2012
Posts: 14,421
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DvnR
They copied our huge-ass alliance idea and ganged up on the strongest competitors first. I don't see you in the Hunger Games, District 11 peasant. Go work the cotton fields where you belong, Diego. *whip-ish* Get picking, ashy lessor.
|
We also did it much better than the Irrelevant-Navy, so much so that we wiped them out completely with less than half of our alliance gone. and let's not pretend the Irrelevant-Navy didn't go after the strongest competitor first, too. Those excuses are so weak.
MockingYous >>> Irrelevant-Navy
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/11/2012
Posts: 14,421
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Raguabros
So I'm gonna give a forum to
helloDer, ethan, stereo.love, crazytowel, boyonce
In The Mockingyous forum only fiercE will be left (For now)
And in the Alliance 3 forum only Razzle will be left.
|
wow. I completely didn't realize we stole Razzle's alliance.
Goodness gracious, this is so tough. Yeah, that's the correct set up though.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/29/2011
Posts: 3,004
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DvnR
1) Attitude/Diego's Hispanic.
2) I'm black.
3) I'm joking.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/21/2011
Posts: 10,659
|
I can't even begin to tell y'all how good this new body armor feels.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/16/2011
Posts: 24,638
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/31/2010
Posts: 26,257
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ethan
We also did it much better than the Irrelevant-Navy, so much so that we wiped them out completely with less than half of our alliance gone. and let's not pretend the Irrelevant-Navy didn't go after the strongest competitor first, too. Those excuses are so weak.
MockingYous >>> Irrelevant-Navy
|
We didn't go after the strongest competitor first though, no shade to the people we went after.
The fun now is that you all get to slaughter each other like a bunch of wild uneducated animals (which, let's be honest, you already have done) while the Irrelevant-Navy is an icon for unity and teamwork.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/2/2009
Posts: 8,661
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DvnR
We didn't go after the strongest competitor first though, no shade to the people we went after.
The fun now is that you all get to slaughter each other like a bunch of wild uneducated animals (which, let's be honest, you already have done) while the Irrelevant-Navy is an icon for unity and teamwork.
|
The last two INers killed each other.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/11/2012
Posts: 14,421
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DvnR
We didn't go after the strongest competitor first though, no shade to the people we went after.
The fun now is that you all get to slaughter each other like a bunch of wild uneducated animals (which, let's be honest, you already have done) while the Irrelevant-Navy is an icon for unity and teamwork.
|
Why did you go after boyonce on the first night then? Surely you didn't think that you were picking off somebody who was not going to be a major player.
You all can keep with that excuse of "now getting to watch us kill each other", because that's really all y'all have at this point But I'd much rather be killed by a MockingYou than an Irrelevant-Navy (which, btw, for the record, your alliance failed in your death wish to take me out ) and in addition, we aren't going to be savage about it at all.
The Irrelevant-Navy is the poster child for how not to run an alliance. It was disorganized and messy.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/5/2011
Posts: 15,413
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ethan
We also did it much better than the Irrelevant-Navy, so much so that we wiped them out completely with less than half of our alliance gone. and let's not pretend the Irrelevant-Navy didn't go after the strongest competitor first, too. Those excuses are so weak.
MockingYous >>> Irrelevant-Navy
|
As boyonce said your power laid in your numbers. Nothing more, nothing less. And don't forget that your alliance got lucky many times during the night and the 1st feast.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/29/2011
Posts: 3,004
|
The second feast was a mess but I can't help it if my teamwork won't comminicate with me
And boyonce was a non factor in day 1. MockingYous, ur strength was in ur numbers, not ur "strategy" and the luck of the random generator was on ur side. Days are the one time luck has nothin to do with this game and y'all did nothin every day, minus feasts which once again come down to luck. Don't forget that
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/2/2009
Posts: 8,661
|
Well then what version of a 'strategy' were you guys using?
Seriously, to everyone who's left, well done. We don't need to listen to anything the deceased have to say about anything
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/11/2012
Posts: 14,421
|
Excuses, excuses. Whatever happened, whatever we did, it worked, and y'all lost.
How was boyonce a non-factor Day 1? I'm not being mean, I just don't understand what that means. It seems like y'all did the same thing we did in trying to take out the unofficial leader or strongest proponent of the alliance.
Our numbers certainly helped us, but it's y'all's fault for not inviting more members into your alliance. Our strategy was better than your's and so was our organization. The end. I think it's pretty obvious considering who all is left... yeah, we did get lucky sometimes with the random generator, but it wasn't completely one sided. Night 1, we both had a player injured and then we also lost two members. We've had casualties in the game, too.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/29/2011
Posts: 3,004
|
If I was to go for the unofficial leader of day 1 I woulda went after u ethan. U gave me that vibe. Ok, non factor was a reach but we just choose at random from the people we wouldn't think would hide.
I accept we lost and I have no problem with that, but the high and mighty attitude is a bit much. This game is luck when it comes down it. There's no "we r the definition of team work and excellence", and I can easily say that anyway cos both teams done goofed.
@crazytowel
There isn't much of a strategy to this game cos it comes down to luck. The height of strategy at night is predictin which member u have a high chance of killin. There is a strategy for day with the votes, but the strategy of at least two alliance members doin nothin overcomes every other strategy with the way days work. And that's essentially what the MYs did. Looking at it, not a bad one since it ensures survival, but its a borin one which leads back to relyin on the luck of the night cycle.
And y'all won't believe me, but I'm not pressed that am out and a MY will win. I just wish more happened while I was still in it
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/11/2012
Posts: 14,421
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hoetenks
If I was to go for the unofficial leader of day 1 I woulda went after u ethan. U gave me that vibe. Ok, non factor was a reach but we just choose at random from the people we wouldn't think would hide.
I accept we lost and I have no problem with that, but the high and mighty attitude is a bit much. This game is luck when it comes down it. There's no "we r the definition of team work and excellence", and I can easily say that anyway cos both teams done goofed.
@crazytowel
There isn't much of a strategy to this game cos it comes down to luck. The height of strategy at night is predictin which member u have a high chance of killin. There is a strategy for day with the votes, but the strategy of at least two alliance members doin nothin overcomes every other strategy with the way days work. And that's essentially what the MYs did. Looking at it, not a bad one since it ensures survival, but its a borin one which leads back to relyin on the luck of the night cycle.
And y'all won't believe me, but I'm not pressed that am out and a MY will win. I just wish more happened while I was still in it
|
This is a great response, seriously. The only reason I'm defending the MockingYous so strongly is because of some of the Irrelevant-Navy who continue to assume the high and mighty position first. I totally agree that both teams made mistakes at times, and we also both got lucky sometimes. That's just the name of the game. If the whole Irrelevant-Navy was like you, Hoetenks, there wouldn't have been so much arguing between the alliances even when everyone was still alive.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/16/2011
Posts: 24,638
|
This game has NOTHING to do with skill. No one is better. It's all sheer luck.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/5/2011
Posts: 15,413
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ethan
Excuses, excuses. Whatever happened, whatever we did, it worked, and y'all lost.
How was boyonce a non-factor Day 1? I'm not being mean, I just don't understand what that means. It seems like y'all did the same thing we did in trying to take out the unofficial leader or strongest proponent of the alliance.
Our numbers certainly helped us, but it's y'all's fault for not inviting more members into your alliance. Our strategy was better than your's and so was our organization. The end. I think it's pretty obvious considering who all is left... yeah, we did get lucky sometimes with the random generator, but it wasn't completely one sided. Night 1, we both had a player injured and then we also lost two members. We've had casualties in the game, too.
|
The best we could to is to injure your members whereas you got lucky and killed our members.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/5/2011
Posts: 15,413
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hoetenks
If I was to go for the unofficial leader of day 1 I woulda went after u ethan. U gave me that vibe. Ok, non factor was a reach but we just choose at random from the people we wouldn't think would hide.
I accept we lost and I have no problem with that, but the high and mighty attitude is a bit much. This game is luck when it comes down it. There's no "we r the definition of team work and excellence", and I can easily say that anyway cos both teams done goofed.
@crazytowel
There isn't much of a strategy to this game cos it comes down to luck. The height of strategy at night is predictin which member u have a high chance of killin. There is a strategy for day with the votes, but the strategy of at least two alliance members doin nothin overcomes every other strategy with the way days work. And that's essentially what the MYs did. Looking at it, not a bad one since it ensures survival, but its a borin one which leads back to relyin on the luck of the night cycle.
And y'all won't believe me, but I'm not pressed that am out and a MY will win. I just wish more happened while I was still in it
|
Exactly my thoughts.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/2/2009
Posts: 8,661
|
I totally get that the game is more based on luck than strategy. I think that's mainly down to the fact that we can't PM each other though. If we were allowed to do that, the game would have been so much more interesting!
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/21/2011
Posts: 10,659
|
Quote:
Originally posted by stereo.love
This game has NOTHING to do with skill. No one is better. It's all sheer luck.
|
I agree that the randomizer element leaves things open to pure luck, but I'd argue that there is an element of skill and strategy in attempting to figure out what the other alliance is doing and how to best target them. It's a mind game with an element of luck.
|
|
|
|
|