Quote:
Originally posted by Moonchild
It's the role of a Justice to interpret the Constitution in the way they see best. Scalia was brilliant, ideology aside, and his opinions were informed and articulate. Criticizing a Justice for interpreting the Constitution, even if you don't agree with them, is walking down the wrong path.
|
How is criticizing someone EVER walking down the wrong path? The judges themselves criticize each other fiercely in their dissents.
The man might have been smart but his interpretations of the Constitution were completely wrong when it mattered most.
Atleast Roberts, albeit a conservative, still tries to vote honest and not down party lines.
