I remember a few weeks ago there as an outrage in the photography world because her concert contracts basically say that if you're hired to photograph any of her concerts her management is entitled to destroy your pictures if they feel the need to and you had to give up the rights of the pictures completely for a one time fee while they could freely use your material for future promotion, merchandise, etc...so they would virtually pay you dust while they could profit from your work.
She was exposed and a few days later the contract was changed to be more flexible
I remember a few weeks ago there as an outrage in the photography world because her concert contracts basically say that if you're hired to photograph any of her concerts her management is entitled to destroy your pictures if they feel the need to and you had to give up the rights of the pictures completely for a one time fee while they could freely use your material for future promotion, merchandise, etc...so they would virtually pay you dust while they could profit from your work.
She was exposed and a few days later the contract was changed to be more flexible
You are 100% wrong I'm not even gonna bother correcting you
Taylor Nation makes me dislike Taylor a tiny bit, which is annoying because I adore her. Both her music and her personality. I think she's one of the most amazing people in the entire world. But her team seem to be doing more harm than good. Like calm down. There's no need to be that diligent. It just makes them come across as disgustingly money-hungry. Like who cares if a vine features of her songs? It's not like anyone's going to choose to a low quality 6 second loop of a song rather than buying the full thing...?
Taylor Nation makes me dislike Taylor a tiny bit, which is annoying because I adore her. Both her music and her personality. I think she's one of the most amazing people in the entire world. But her team seem to be doing more harm than good. Like calm down. There's no need to be that diligent. It just makes them come across as disgustingly money-hungry. Like who cares if a vine features of her songs? It's not like anyone's going to choose to a low quality 6 second loop of a song rather than buying the full thing...?
This is actually pretty funny Taylor's still a multi-millionaire, so if copyrights keep her winning then so be it! But anyway, this is a bit extra. If it makes the Anti-Swifties fume, though, then I don't mind! I love seeing these comments
"She's not sweet or innocent!"
Literally how does trademarking images of herself make her "not sweet" or "not innocent" ?
Taylor's still a multi-millionaire, so if copyrights keep her winning then so be it! But anyway, this is a bit extra. If it makes the Anti-Swifties fume, though, then I don't mind! I love seeing these comments