| |
Music News: Taylor Swift is the Top-Selling Digital Artist in History
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 9/24/2009
Posts: 70,975
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bibliotheque
Looks like you still got the meaning of it 
There's also a full stop at the end of sentences "With an A ." if you're really going to start preaching an english class. |
I'm not.It's just a pet peeve to see mispelled words. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/20/2006
Posts: 18,138
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bibliotheque
Where are you getting two different albums from.
Lady Gaga The Fame (Monster) 6,707,000
Lady GaGa The Monster E.P. (special U.S. release) 636,000
You see? Charting S-E-P-E-R-A-T-E-L-Y
And they both rereleased with like 8 new tracks so don't even try that card.
|
Notice how the Monster sits quietly after The Fame?
and yes. Those numbers are after 9392174398219 singles and famewhoring.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/1/2008
Posts: 52,761
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bibliotheque
|
Yeah, but... let's see, when was "Fearless" (  ) released? 2008 right?
When was The Fame Monster released?
And yet you're showing me a chart like trying to compare both albums recent sales 
The fact a two year old album's recent sales are comparable to a new one just prooves the point, so thanks for pointing it out.
And I know you got a lot more to reply but I wasnt the one who brought up Gaga here and I'm not the one who's gonna fight about her. I just came here to post about Taylor and if someone has a problem they better take it to SYG.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/30/2009
Posts: 79,408
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bibliotheque
Where are you getting two different albums from.
Lady Gaga The Fame (Monster) 6,707,000
Lady GaGa The Monster E.P. (special U.S. release) 636,000
You see? Charting S-E-P-E-R-A-T-E-L-Y
And they both rereleased with like 8 new tracks so don't even try that card.
|
Let me see the source for that, since those sales are nowhere to be found. 
And 'Monster' is already included in the 'Fame' sales - The Fame (Monster).
EDIT: Found the source, but it doesn't matter, cause the album is anyway credited twice, separately and combined with 'Fame'. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/25/2009
Posts: 13,550
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Champ
Notice how the Monster sits quietly after The Fame?
and yes. Those numbers are after 9392174398219 singles and famewhoring.
|
It's called a rerelease...
Which Taylor also did, so I don't understand how you can't grasp the concept.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/30/2009
Posts: 79,408
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Razzle
It's SEPARATELY.With an A
|
This killed me. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/13/2010
Posts: 7,944
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bibliotheque
It's called a rerelease...
Which Taylor also did, so I don't understand how you can't grasp the concept.
|
ye they wont admit to that
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/25/2009
Posts: 13,550
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Duca
Let me see the source for that, since those sales are nowhere to be found.
And 'Monster' is already included in the 'Fame' sales - The Fame (Monster). |
http://www.worldwidealbums.net/
click 2008 total to date and look at the #2 album
then click 2009 to date and scroll to where 600k is, you can do that right? 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/7/2009
Posts: 9,863
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bibliotheque
It's called a rerelease...
Which Taylor also did, so I don't understand how you can't grasp the concept.
|
Even before re-releasing Taylor was outdoing your fave
Your fave needed to release a new album, merge with another one and re-released, fame*****d, almost died for exhaustion, yet, with all that hype, with all that overrating, she couldn't manage to be #1 and Susan Boyle did better than her and so did Taylor Swift....
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/20/2006
Posts: 18,138
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Delicious
dead @ justin beiber about to snatch the #1 spot on iTunes 
 |
LMAO. Try Again.
That song is not even a single from her album, and it still manages to go heights on iTunes. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/25/2009
Posts: 13,550
|
The Monster is in brackets because she slightly changed the title for the rerelease, instead of just added (Deluxe Edition) etc like the majority.
Don't be mad at a splash of creativity 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/13/2010
Posts: 7,944
|
deda @ GaGa having so many of the girls pressed. I know yall cant but its a GaGa world you just live in it
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/30/2009
Posts: 79,408
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bibliotheque
http://www.worldwidealbums.net/
click 2008 total to date and look at the #2 album
then click 2009 to date and scroll to where 600k is, you can do that right?
|
'Monster' is credited separately and combined with the 'Fame', so it doesn't even matter.
Taylor outsold her!!! 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/12/2009
Posts: 14,298
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Champ
Notice how the Monster sits quietly after The Fame?
and yes. Those numbers are after 9392174398219 singles and famewhoring.
|
Hasnt Taylor released more singles than Gaga?  lol sorry if i'm wrong xD
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/25/2009
Posts: 13,550
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Vini
Even before re-releasing Taylor was outdoing your fave
Your fave needed to release a new album, merge with another one and re-released, fame*****d, almost died for exhaustion, yet, with all that hype, with all that overrating, she couldn't manage to be #1 and Susan Boyle did better than her and so did Taylor Swift....
|
Taylor also rereleased.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/7/2009
Posts: 9,863
|
BY THE WAY, Worldwide Albums and Mediatraffic are no reliable sources. First, WWA is biased, How come a site that makes a worst albums list be reliable? Secondly, Mediatraffic has no reliability for singles chart, They may have some near accurate figures for album sales, but their singles chart isn't accurate at all...
& ^ CAN'T YOU READ? I said even before re-releasing, even before TAYLOR re-released...
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/25/2009
Posts: 13,550
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Duca
'Monster' is credited separately and combined with the 'Fame', so it doesn't even matter.
Taylor outsold her!!! |
Too ****ing stupid
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/25/2009
Posts: 13,550
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Vini
BY THE WAY, Worldwide Albums and Mediatraffic are no reliable sources. First, WWA is biased, How come a site that makes a worst albums list be reliable? Secondly, Mediatraffic has no reliability for singles chart, They may have some near accurate figures for album sales, but their singles chart isn't accurate at all...
|
You're so right!
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/20/2006
Posts: 18,138
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bibliotheque
It's called a rerelease...
Which Taylor also did, so I don't understand how you can't grasp the concept.
|
Taylor's re-release was without a new single. [she still managed to chart high anyways]
In Gaga's case she is still planning ***** herself up, and release another 785756898 singles
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/30/2009
Posts: 79,408
|
And another funny fact. 
Taylor outsold GaGa with only 3 singles and one album and GaGa had two albums and 7 singles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
