I'm not quite sure why the Britney stans are even in here in the first place. The only comments coming from them are bitter, spiteful comments about what Gene Simmons (a legendary rocker) said. Now, it's even turning into a Britney vs KISS thread. Why even bring up Britney??? Way to get the thread shut down. Will that make you crybabies happy? I say hand out WPs to all these people inciting the stan war, especially bringing Britney into a thread where she isn't mentioned.
KISS is now suddenly a bunch of has-beens and irrelevant? Sure they're old, but they've made a definitive mark on rock/metal. Just because they've since retired it doesn't make them nobodies. If we apply the same logic (he's old, therefore he's irrelevant), then I suppose we can say the same about Cher? Can we apply that label to Britney when she's 50 or 60? That argument isn't fair at all
You all need to get a grip. Gene Simmons' comment is still entirely subjective. It's great that a legend praised her (how many legends have praised Gaga?) but it is only his opinion. ONE OPINION. You Britney stans need to calm down. If he was just a nobody, why even get so bitter and hateful?
What is Duca trying to prove with Britney being more legendary than KISS? That's irrelevant to the topic. This IS NOT about Britney.
Lady GaGa is the type of artist/performer he is into. I mean, he's a member of KISS, a group who was dependent on shock value and stage stunts. It would make sense for him to think GaGa is the only interesting thing going for the VMAs.
I didn't even read of course too long but the title is so absurd you don't even wanna read. We all know who rules the VMA since like 98, Britney Spears so she gets that title and NOT only her, Beyoncé has ruled VMA for severall years as well she also owns that title, I am not saying GaGa doesnt she does as well but she is not the ONLY exciting artist. Besides the three, Adele and Katy as well.
What I find funny is how all of you are so willing to bring the PAST to further strengthen your argument. Yet, you REFUSE to acknowledge KISS's credibility because he was at his prime in the PAST.
I agree, but I think it just depends on what you find exciting and entertaining. Like, I haven't a clue how people think Rihanna, Ke$ha, and Katy entertaining and exciting, but people do because people like different things. It's just an opinion.
Lady GaGa is the type of artist/performer he is into. I mean, he's a member of KISS, a group who was dependent on shock value and stage stunts. It would make sense for him to think GaGa is the only interesting thing going for the VMAs.
Exactly. Artists like Beyonce and Britney Spears who are more dependent on their vocal performance and dancing would not appeal to him.
Lady GaGa is the type of artist/performer he is into. I mean, he's a member of KISS, a group who was dependent on shock value and stage stunts. It would make sense for him to think GaGa is the only interesting thing going for the VMAs.
I agree. It's just his opinion because he's more interested in the likes of Gaga.