[Sahn]

Originally posted by Human Nature

Oh, does grandma makes me laugh when she says silly things like this.

Does she not remember when she shamelessly spread her hairy ***** all over HER sex book? Does she not remember the Erotica era? I guess that's what old age, Alzheimers, and pure stupidity does to you. Showing your nipple isn't even that big of a deal, I mean everybody has one - everybody has seen one, but okay. You would think somebody of her caliber wouldn't have an issue with a nipple.

Oh god. This again.

That was 20 ****ING YEARS AGO it was interesting and cutting edge at the time. Now it's NOT because she already did it 2 decades ago.

[Auburn]

Originally posted by Blueberry Kisses

I read the title and thought Madge and Janet got in a bar fight.

[Chileno]

[DrunkNHotBoyz]

Originally posted by Nicole

Madonna did show her nipples and far worse, but she didn't make any apologies for it. Based on this little jab and past ones, I think she doesn't believe that Janet's nip slip was an accident (I don't either) and she doesn't like women who have to apologize for pushing the envelope. It kind of defeats the purpose. If you're a strong female, you don't need permission

Girl... be quiet. Janet already said that when she made that apology that she felt like she shouldn't have been apologizing in the first place. That's why she didn't do it again at the Grammy's. It CLEARLY was an accident. Besides, Janet didn't need to show her nipple for attention or controversy. She's Janet. They asked her to perform at the Superbowl for a reason.

[Smooth Criminal]

Originally posted by ImpressiveInstant

Did she say Janet needs to show a nipple to entertain?
Did I say Janet needs to show a nipple to entertain?

of course she didn't. we're saying it's shade.
had she said that, we would have named it beef.

why is it so hard to understand such subtle things? why is it sometimes feasible for y'all to agree Madonna can be shady and sometimes y'all act like she would never speak badly of anyone? she has shaded Janet, someone who spoke good of her. Is that why you can't assume it?

[fineandbambi]

Originally posted by Lipton

Get your life(and these WP).

Originally posted by Icing

I don't buy it.







You don't go from "stanning" for someone to this within a matter of hours. But we can save this for another time.

[Haus]

Pathetic, all she's doing lately is shading all of her competition. I hope her era flops + I can't wait to ******* MDNA

[Human Nature]

Originally posted by ImpressiveInstant

Girl sit. She said she doesn't need to show nipples to be entertaining, when the interviewer asked her if she wanted to do something naughty on the Superbowl. And she's known that since forever - the woman has a career based on entertaining people, come on.

Watch The Confessions Tour. Did she show any nipple on that? No.

Is it entertaining? Hell yes.

I don't care if she showed any nipples or not during The Confessions Tour, the point is she still came out with a sex book filled with pictures of her titties and *****, and it's hypocritical to sit there and talk about how you don't have to show your nipples to be entertaining when she showed MORE than just her nipples in the past. Maybe her opinions of all that have changed now that she's older, but given her past, she could keep her mouth shut.

[Nicole]

Originally posted by ImpressiveInstant

She already does it. If you watch the Graham Norton interview for example, it's basically all about that.

ATRL just pays attention to the (sometimes imaginary) mess, though.

It doesn't matter b/c it's like the rest of the interview doesn't exist. It's not just ATRL. As someone who's been in the biz for 30 years, she should know that the media is, um, reductive that way - they'll reduce a long and varied interview to one headline about what she thinks of so-and-so.

[Reza]

She even shades better than our faves

[Human Nature]

Originally posted by Sahn

Oh god. This again.

That was 20 ****ING YEARS AGO it was interesting and cutting edge at the time. Now it's NOT because she already did it 2 decades ago.

YES, this again. It was 20 ****ING YEARS AGO but it was still tasteless and trashy. If she had her way and was still young, you know damn well her ****ty ass would still be getting pictures taken of her ***** whether or not it was 20 ****ING YEARS AGO. Instead of sitting there and shading other artists over and over again, she should be focused on herself, but I digress.

[RihMark]

Originally posted by Ivan_brit

Madonna is comming strong thsi year!!

I mean who cares of Janet!
Can´t wait for the Super Bowl it would be amazing!

[ImpressiveInstant]

Originally posted by Nicole

It doesn't matter b/c it's like the rest of the interview doesn't exist. It's not just ATRL. As someone who's been in the biz for 30 years, she should know that the media is, um, reductive that way - they'll reduce a long and varied interview to one headline about what she thinks of so-and-so.

The media and ATRL.
It's not like she isn't talking about the record or the movie.

[Nicole]

Originally posted by Sahn

Oh god. This again.

That was 20 ****ING YEARS AGO it was interesting and cutting edge at the time. Now it's NOT because she already did it 2 decades ago.

lol madonna was not the first icon to show her nipples. marilyn, for one (of many), did it decades before.

[UAE]

didn't they "leak" her naked pictures behind the scene of her tour couple of months ago ?

You don't have to show nipples to be interesting, or/and it necessarily doesn't mean your cutting edge if you do, right? riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

[ImpressiveInstant]

Originally posted by Smooth Criminal

why is it so hard to understand such subtle things? why is it sometimes feasible for y'all to agree Madonna can be shady and sometimes y'all act like she would never speak badly of anyone? she has shaded Janet, someone who spoke good of her. Is that why you can't assume it?

She can be shady, but she didn't shade Janet this time. It was a natural answer to the question.

You can say she was shady with the "reductive"/"look it up" stuff, but this? No way.

[Elusive Chanteuse]

How is this shade?

[Onen]

Janet showing her nipple was not an accident just like the sex book wasnt an "accident". lets not.

[Sahn]

Originally posted by Nicole

lol madonna was not the first icon to show her nipples. marilyn, for one (of many), did it decades before.

After Madonna it wasn't interesting anyomore.

[KyKy]

Drag ha!!!!