NONE of it was "art." I don't give a damn what the hell (T)Rolling Stone says or thinks, or any news sources for that matter. Many of the same news sources dragged her not too long ago.
I suggest you do some research about performance art, because what Gaga did last night was FAR tamer than what some other notable works have featured. Sorry if it bothers you but yes, it was performance art.
IF Gaga's performance was in fact "offensive" as some would like to believe, then the critics would've been the first ones to rip her to shreds for being insensitive.
All the critics have praised her....they have knowledge, they are experts....they know Gaga didnt do anything "offensive."
Just because Gaga does something completely weird and irrelevant with her performance doesn't mean it's art. Poor all people who feels the need to pretend that it is art
IF Gaga's performance was in fact "offensive" as some would like to believe, then the critics would've been the first ones to rip her to shreds for being insensitive.
All the critics have praised her....they have knowledge, they are experts....they know Gaga didnt do anything "offensive."
Just because Gaga does something completely weird and irrelevant with her performance doesn't mean it's art. Poor all people who feels the need to pretend that it is art
This again? It's art by definition, you don't have to like it to realize that you just have to know what art is.
