[P!nkInside]

Originally posted by BoyOnBoy Wonder

That's my cue to leave.

Can't handle the truth?

[Lucas32]

Originally posted by BoyOnBoy Wonder

That's my cue to leave.

Praise Underdogs

[Green]

Originally posted by CaptainMusic

Why the 'EVEN' like it's something extremely impressive?

First Greatest Hits albums by Artists tend to sell well. I mean, Britney's first GH sold 6-7 million with two moderately successful singles and not a single performance.

And DEATH @ Kelly Clarkson being consistent.

It's not 2004 anymore though, Greatest Hits don't sell anymore like it did in the past. P!nk is the exception. She's outselling studio albums with a Greatest Hit in 2011.

[BoyOnBoy Wonder]

To answer the question:

No, she isn't. Beyoncé is the most consistent artist of the 2000s.

[Ozzy8923]

Originally posted by Damien M

Umm.... No one cares.
-
Anyway, to answer the question, P!nk does fit the criteria, so i'd say yes.

I was answering the question on the OP. I think P!nk is consistent, but In my opinion there are artists (like Britney) who is just as consistent. No need to be rude. If you didn't care you wouldn't of responded.

[fanoftalent]

Originally posted by BoyOnBoy Wonder

Reading is fundamental seeing as '4' was released in 2011 (not the decade in the OP).

2000s may refer to:

2000s (decade), the first decade of the 3rd millennium.
The period from 2000 to 2099, almost synonymous with the 21st century (2001–2100)
The period from 2000 to 2999, almost synonymous with the 3rd millennium (2001–3000)

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000s

2000s applies to the period until today.

[Underdogs]

Originally posted by BoyOnBoy Wonder

To answer the question:

No, she isn't. Beyoncé is the most consistent artist of the 2000s.

Thank you for your opinion

The Truth About Love's performance on the charts will hopefully change your mind

Unless you stan for Beyonce, of course.

[rihannabiggestfan]

Beyonce is not consistent. Pink is. Plus she is the most consistent

[Devon]

Originally posted by Chivas

All I'm saying is that all of her albums have produced at least one top 10 hit and have gone platinum. She has no Bionics or Goodbye Lullabies to speak of.

Don't even put Goodbye Lullaby in the same category as Bionic

[lpd446]

Originally posted by BoyOnBoy Wonder

To answer the question:

No, she isn't. Beyoncé is the most consistent artist of the 2000s.

Can you provide receipts pls

Honestly Beyonce has only had CIL, Single Ladies, and maybe Halo and Irraplacible in the 2000s...

[CaptainMusic]

Originally posted by Green

It's not 2004 anymore though, Greatest Hits don't sell anymore like it did in the past. P!nk is the exception. She's outselling studio albums with a Greatest Hit in 2011.

Albums in general don't sell like they did in the past.

First Greatest Hits have always sold well, it's not something new. If Rihanna or Beyonce released one it'd easily sell around the same amount that P!nk's did.

[Swag]

Underrated, I love her, but don't like her new single and video

[fanoftalent]

In terms of consistency in 2000s (girls with 3 or more albums qualify only):

1) Pink
2) Rihanna
3) Beyonce
4) Alicia Keys
5) Britney
6) Xtina

[Arking]

Originally posted by BoyOnBoy Wonder

'Try This' happened.



Not to mention, her consistency makes her dull. She's simply middling; other than Australia, no others location is *obsessed* with her.

Pretty much. Ever since Missunderstood she's consistently released pop-rock with a chip on its shoulder. I really enjoyed her ballads on Funhouse, but all in all I find she's underrated and it doesn't surprise me. Despite that, she has a great voice, performs well (Sober and Glitter In the Air live performances are cult-status iconic) and has consistent release/single numbers.

[fanoftalent]

Originally posted by CaptainMusic

Albums in general don't sell like they did in the past.

First Greatest Hits have always sold well, it's not something new. If Rihanna or Beyonce released one it'd easily sell around the same amount that P!nk's did.

That's the point. Not easily. And probably not at all.

[P!nkInside]

Originally posted by fanoftalent

In terms of consistency in 2000s (girls with 3 or more albums qualify only):

1) Pink
2) Rihanna
3) Beyonce
4) Alicia Keys
5) Britney
6) Xtina

Gaga and Katy will join that list in a few years

[Damien M]

Originally posted by Ozzy8923

I was answering the question on the OP. I think P!nk is consistent, but In my opinion there are artists (like Britney) who is just as consistent. No need to be rude. If you didn't care you wouldn't of responded.

That smiley at the end. Very diplomatic.


Anyway, i'm just wondering why the thread is full of Britney fans trying to prove this + that. Let P!nk have her shine lol. Nothing personal.

[Percivalx]

Originally posted by BoyOnBoy Wonder

To answer the question:

No, she isn't. Beyoncé is the most consistent artist of the 2000s.

You know what? You are right. Beyonce has been the most consistent....at trying to get writing credits on the songs she sings. Those allegations have always and probably will always plague Beyonce. Yup! You're right. Consistent she is!

[Ramcoro]

Originally posted by fanoftalent

I think Pink has already had an "it" era. People might not remember it well (as I noticed that ATRL is lately flooded by 14-year olds), but "M!ssundaztood" era was HUGE and inspired the whole female pop-rock movement.

I kinda think Funhouse was bigger and her peak.

OT: Yes

[CaptainMusic]

Rihanna isn't more consistent than Britney either considering 'Circus' has outsold 4 of her 6 albums and she's only had 2 big eras.