not inverted actually admitting nicole in all her flawless perfection
Don't worry. I'll start a discussion about her boobs and nose sometime again.
Quote:
Originally posted by amenjena
cos i never know how and somehow always screw something up and its taken down.
You already know how to make a thread. All you need to is press "Post New Thread" when you open any section of the forum. Also, none of your threads were taken down. One was closed because those trolling robot stans ruined it.
Quote:
Originally posted by amenjena
PLS SUMONE NEED TO MAKE THREAD F THIS FCKEN KWEEN
IM DONE
You don't need to edit the pictures of her. She looks better naturally.
Don't worry. I'll start a discussion about her boobs and nose sometime again.
You already know how to make a thread. All you need to is press "Post New Thread" when you open any section of the forum. Also, none of your threads were taken down. One was closed because those trolling robot stans ruined it.
You don't need to edit the pictures of her. She looks better naturally.
no remember that time i posted in the wrong section or smthing
I DIDNT THO I ONLY DID A FEW, REST ARE FROM OTHA PPL. and i would have wanted to post the non editted ones but they are far too big and these pics were easy to copy and paste straight frm tumblr
It's easy. Pics and general news go in Celebria, videos go in Videos, questions/discussion go in Base and news about singles and albums go in Music News.
You should make animations of Nicole without editing like those Cheryl ones and I want to use more Nicole ones:
the main reason why ppl dont leave gifs unedited is the lighting is too dim and dark. on tv this doesnt matter but the whole point of making gifs is to replay the moment and by enhancing the coloring, its makes it even better. you always act any form of editing is slaughter to the orginal graphic when mostly its just and enhance and to get rid of shadows etc
But they use so much lighting on the show I'm not sure why it's necessary. The GIF I posted above is very well lit. Also, remember that Daily Mail Weekend cover? Whoever edited that definitely overdid it. Slaughtering is accurate.
hahaha it was a scan so the quality would have been very grainy. nope but cos you dont ps you dont notice the cyan around her hairline from the shadows and the lighting is almost gradiented where the bottom half of her is brighter than her face which is a no no
hahaha it was a scan so the quality would have been very grainy. nope but cos you dont ps you dont notice the cyan around her hairline from the shadows and the lighting is almost gradiented where the bottom half of her is brighter than her face which is a no no
Shadow and different type of lighting hitting is her natural. You'll see that in photos too. And adding excessive lighting to a grainy scan isn't going to make it look better.
****ing flawlesssssssssssssssss
rest of tumblr agrees
