[Gee]

My favorite thread of the year so far.

[beautiful player]

Gangsters & lipsters, you know what to do. Log OUT until Friday and hope this has blown over by then. There's no other way out of this.

[chilicheese01]

Is she really 51?

[jqnetto]

Originally posted by slw84

At least Lana will have the most iconic #51 peaking song of all time.

Small battles to win
[/I]

Actually, she won't. Since "Stan" peaked at #51 back in 2000.

I guess she just can't win. Poor girl.

[Pedro-Bextor]

The ABSOLUTE kiis I got from the exposés and controversy in this thread :aah:

[ezra]

Originally posted by iHype.

Why would Lana and her label need an apology?

They knew from the get go that chart was wrong. Interscope would know how much their own music sold and they'd know she didn't go from 70k to 248k. There's a reason neither her or the label ever acknowledged the chart. Only Fans did.

True. It was just Lana stans who were in denial. Everyone else knew, including Lana if she even pays attention to it (doubt it).

[umich]

So, based off of Lana's correction, the other positions should be:

13. 679 +4
15. Photograph +4
16. Cool For The Summer +4
26. Drag Me Down -23

[Idontcareaboutyou]

Originally posted by Artemisia

The fact this was obvious to everyone but the Lana stans really goes to show how stanning deludes your good judgment.

In general, when everyone agrees on something except the stans of a given artist, you know they're wrong.

[mariomania]

[Cz!]

Still shaking.

[Diarrhoea]

Originally posted by ezra

True. It was just Lana stans who were in denial. Everyone else knew, including Lana if she even pays attention to it (doubt it).

only 80% of us. the sane ones (basically me and ontherocks) never bought it.

[Teneo]

Someone do a quick explanation of what happened and quote the best posts, please, I don't understand

[MusicLoverDude]

Oh boy

At least Selena and Demi moved up

[URBAN]

Originally posted by romonster

Billboard right now:

OMG!!

[ultraviolento]

Wait at the difference being 181,000?

This was Ultraviolence's first week sales.... Interesting.

[Azealia Banks]

LMFAOOOO

g. 18, 2:15 p.m.: This story has been updated to reflect new chart data, which was reprocessed by Nielsen Music following the story's original Monday posting. As a result, Lana Del Rey's "High By the Beach" debuts at No. 51 on the Billboard Hot 100 instead of No. 7. On Digital Songs, it debuts at No. 10 instead of No. 1, with 67,000 sold, instead of 248,000, as originally reported. The information below has been updated to reflect corrected data.

[havefaithrestart]

Originally posted by Amoeba

I'm not lyme-ing

This is petty

[Superiore]

Originally posted by jax.

And all I was doing was celebrating Lana's success (even though it was false) and happy that she had bigger numbers than another huge star's lead single.

I don't understand the issue but you can continue to "expose" me or whatever. Just know that you people are really hypocritical for laughing at someone's chart positions.

Find me where I laughed about it in here. I certainly didn't because I like the song. The only thing that made me laugh is the 180° turn some of you took tonight with your posts and how you're putting the blame on others when you were the first ones to be abrasive about it. And the way you and the others were celebrating about it outselling Applause wasn't innocent at all. Trolling, if you ask me.

[Fizzy]

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=848228
This locked thread tho .. Haha

[H-I-M]

Originally posted by Diarrhoea

only 80% of us. the sane ones (basically me and ontherocks) never bought it.

So you're implying that she only has 10 stans here ? It would sure explain that tragic peak.