Quote:
Originally posted by Element
The common eyewitness account of the story is that the officer shot him without any provocation. Other people have suggested that the victim was threatening the police officer after robbing a convenience store, thus prompting the shooting. It all depends on who you ask.
|
So how can a verdict be reached if there's no evidence and just hearsay and conflicting eyewitness accounts?
He could be in the right if he was threatened with a weapon but judging by this reaction either it was clear he didn't have one or people are just doing the most.
I should read the transcripts of the trial...
Sounds fascinating I wonder what the truth actually is.
Edit: Reading evidence now, seeming SUPER GUILTY rn nevermind