|
Discussion: FROOT reviews - 8/10 NME | 78 Metacritic
Banned
Member Since: 11/24/2009
Posts: 61,404
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2011
Posts: 4,303
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Nicole
|
They posted two different reviews, yet the positive one is titled The Observer (UK) on Metacritic while the mixed review is the one credited from The Guardian.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/27/2011
Posts: 36,557
|
Quote:
Originally posted by нαυѕσƒנα¢к
They posted two different reviews, yet the positive one is titled The Observer (UK) on Metacritic while the mixed review is the one credited from The Guardian.
|
Wow! The Guardian gave La Roux's Trouble in Paradise album a 100. FROOT deserves up there too, since both albums are great
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 3,576
|
**** them for bringing her score down to a 78
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/17/2012
Posts: 3,912
|
It's a flawless cohesive album, sure nothing stands out or is screaming for huge success on the charts but it's so natural and the production and lyricism as well as Marina's gorgeous voice make it unique.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/27/2011
Posts: 36,557
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2010
Posts: 71,871
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 2,194
|
Ugh why the **** 77
I'm ready to fight them
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/20/2012
Posts: 24,225
|
If this album ends up with a score in the high 70s, it's only because it is not receiving many reviews from legitimate publications. If an album only receives a small amount of reviews, it's possible that its score will be really bad or really good. It isn't always really good. In this case, it probably will be, which is stupid, because most of these publications don't have much credibility to their name. The only ones that I really know are Entertainment Weekly, All Music Guide, The Guardian, and maybe Boston Globe. I've never heard of DIY Magazine and The Line of Best Fit.
If this ends up with a high score, it's only because credible publications like Rolling Stone, PopMatters, The A.V. Club, Billboard, Consequence of Sound, Spin, NME, and Pitchfork are ignoring it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/25/2012
Posts: 41,860
|
Quote:
Originally posted by chilicheese01
If this album ends up with a score in the high 70s, it's only because it is not receiving many reviews from legitimate publications. If an album only receives a small amount of reviews, it's possible that its score will be really bad or really good. It isn't always really good. In this case, it probably will be, which is stupid, because most of these publications don't have much credibility to their name. The only ones that I really know are Entertainment Weekly, All Music Guide, The Guardian, and maybe Boston Globe. I've never heard of DIY Magazine and The Line of Best Fit.
If this ends up with a high score, it's only because credible publications like Rolling Stone, PopMatters, The A.V. Club, Billboard, Consequence of Sound, Spin, NME, and Pitchfork are ignoring it.
|
no one cares
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/27/2011
Posts: 36,557
|
Quote:
Originally posted by chilicheese01
If this album ends up with a score in the high 70s, it's only because it is not receiving many reviews from legitimate publications. If an album only receives a small amount of reviews, it's possible that its score will be really bad or really good. It isn't always really good. In this case, it probably will be, which is stupid, because most of these publications don't have much credibility to their name. The only ones that I really know are Entertainment Weekly, All Music Guide, The Guardian, and maybe Boston Globe. I've never heard of DIY Magazine and The Line of Best Fit.
If this ends up with a high score, it's only because credible publications like Rolling Stone, PopMatters, The A.V. Club, Billboard, Consequence of Sound, Spin, NME, and Pitchfork are ignoring it.
|
What if the credible publications would rate it high tho? It's not impossible
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/20/2012
Posts: 24,225
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dollas n Diamonds
no one cares
|
Cared enough to hit "Reply w/ Quote."
Quote:
Originally posted by rihannabiggestfan
What if the credible publications would rate it high tho? It's not impossible
|
That's true, but right now, the score doesn't hold much weight. Good for ha, though.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2011
Posts: 4,303
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/16/2012
Posts: 7,827
|
it's amazing that it has gotten good reviews--very unexpected.
then again, only 9 reviews, so it doesn't really say that much. but still
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 3,247
|
Quote:
Originally posted by chilicheese01
If this album ends up with a score in the high 70s, it's only because it is not receiving many reviews from legitimate publications. If an album only receives a small amount of reviews, it's possible that its score will be really bad or really good. It isn't always really good. In this case, it probably will be, which is stupid, because most of these publications don't have much credibility to their name. The only ones that I really know are Entertainment Weekly, All Music Guide, The Guardian, and maybe Boston Globe. I've never heard of DIY Magazine and The Line of Best Fit.
If this ends up with a high score, it's only because credible publications like Rolling Stone, PopMatters, The A.V. Club, Billboard, Consequence of Sound, Spin, NME, and Pitchfork are ignoring it.
|
You care about this way too much.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/27/2011
Posts: 36,557
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/30/2011
Posts: 10,415
|
The album is good. I hope we get at least 4-9 more reviews so the haters will shut it!
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2011
Posts: 4,303
|
Added the two new reviews to the OP.
98% - Sputnik Music
70% - Uncut
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/7/2012
Posts: 3,268
|
8/10 from NME and 4/4 Stars from Q Magazine.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/4/2014
Posts: 3,943
|
Can someone link me to the NME review? Can't find it
|
|
|
|
|