[H-I-M]

You guys need to keep in mind that yes, Rita also performed at the Oscars, but on top of making headlines WW Gaga also won another Grammy, had 2 #1 albums within 12 months and had a tour that grossed over 80M WW.

[BlueNavy]

not a B lister ... she is below.

[Bounce]

Originally posted by BlueNavy

not a B lister ... she is below.

But...

let me not



OT: Of course!

[Summerboy95]

Well...if you are invited to perform at the biggest awards show with no nominated song,where every single important celebrity is there,where they announce your performance at every commercial since the beginning of the damn program while you perform at the end of the show and when you perform they give you an standing ovation and you steal the show...

When you can do that and also manage to tour WW even in an underperforming era I think you can be considered an A/A+ lister

[blackraven]

Is that even a question?
She might not be the most current new popstar everyone is talking about but already crossed the line when she will be remembered for a long time even if she doesn't release anything in her life.

[Mariano]

Originally posted by ontherocks

Give me the defintion of A-lister?

In terms of her name being known? Yes she is. In terms of being extremly popular? Nah, she ain't.

A lister means being FAMOUS.

Meghan Trainer is not A list, but she is extremely popular currently... same for Ariana, Iggy etc. they are not A listers

People here embarrassing themselves... what's new

Originally posted by Cain

I'd say she's on Nicki Minaj level rn, both really famous ww but can't really go Platinum anymore and everything in their careers is declining.

They are probably A-listers, but then there's people like Beyoncé, Rihanna and Taylor Swift which would be A+listers I guess?

eeeew at all the flaws in this post... Nicki Minaj can't go platinum after what .. ? 3 years and how many albums sold ?

Lady Gaga couldn't go platinum with 1 album after what ... ? 10M+ albums sold in the USA alone, which is more than what Nicki has sold WW....

Don't even try to compare Nicki to Gaga, this is so wrong Lady Gaga's impact from 2010 alone >>>>> Nicki's overall impact.

Lady Gaga has legacy like TF, TFM, Born This Way and touring numbers around 200M 2 times + 1 nearly 100M tour.... these eclipse anything that Nicki has done + what she will do in the next 10 years....

You can't be famous (the most famous according to Guiness in 2012) one year and then 2 years later not be famous anymore A list is not about popular, it's about FAMOUS.

Famous means people KNOW your name. Just because Gaga dissapeared for 2 years doesn't mean people suddenly stopped knowing her name The stupidity here....

[Dämon]

No. C-Lister. Which is great, y'all won't be able to drag her for her sales anymore.

[Mariano]

Originally posted by Brando

Somewhere between C & D. Her next era will prove that.
She was a C lister during artpop and D lister during c2c.
She might rebound a little during her next era, because she got a bit of a positive momentum now, but she'll never have the public on her side no matter what she does. Her days of A list and B list status are long over.

While at it, I also think her next album will be of better quality than artpop and will do a little better critically (not a hard feat, but hey)

This is why I never take your comments seriously.. I really hope you are just trolling and don't actually believe urself

[Whiskey Mouth]

Of course Lady Gaga is still an A-list popstar. So selling 110M+ records WW (outdated receipt, btw), having half a billion career tour gross in total, obliterating everyone for 5 consecutive years in the industry, winning 6 Grammys and being the biggest phenomenon ever since Britney Spears is suddenly erased because of ARTPOP underperforming? Let's wait till she flops for 5 consecutive years before we can make those assumptions, because right now all we're able to see is that some people have been perched in here since 2008 just waiting to grab onto any little thing to undermine Gaga

[Aaron]

Originally posted by Madam X

Of course. Pop stars like Lady Gaga, Xtina, Britney and Madonna will always be A-list, even when they "underperform". Lady Gaga's accomplishments have secured her status.

WTF @ trying to sneak Xtina in the list. Anyway, obviously not.

[Benjamin]

Never heard of them, are they a man or a woman?

A-listers status isn't connected to music success, it's based on how powerful your name is in the media, and Gaga is clearly still very strong in that area.

... Not that I know why performing at the Oscars (that I didn't know about for like 2 days after. ) apparently led to her dominating February?

[Reb'l Rêveur]

Almost there...

[ScarletWitch]

LOL

The fact that the obsessed haters have to write essays to prove that she's not A list while being clocked with 1 or 2 lines kinda says it all don't it?

OT: Obviously A list (and maybe above). Since when can B listers and below sit in the FRONT ROW of a Belanciaga Fashion Show in Paris with ANNA WINTOUR?

[Samuel.]

Duh.

[Giorgoc]

Originally posted by BlueNavy

not a B lister ... she is below.

I'd love to see your reaction when R8 sells on par with ARTPOP.

Are people really mentioning Rita Ora's performance of a nominated song with Gaga's INVITATION to do a TRIBUTE to The Sound of Music in the same sentence? Does Gaga have you reaching that far for a way to downplay her? Jeez...

Yes, she's an A lister. She's a pop girl who sold over 10M records in her underperforming era, had 2 #1 albums in a year and grossed almost 90M with 75 dates. Show me ONE B lister who can do that and I'll back off.

[romonster]

She is without a doubt still an A-Lister. Anyone who says she is below that is clearly delusional.

[Giorgoc]

And slay at Gaga not being A list because her last smash era was 3 years ago while Madonna is even though her last smash era was a decade ago. Double standards much?

[ScarletWitch]

Originally posted by Giorgoc

And slay at Gaga not being A list because her last smash era was 3 years ago while Madonna is even though her last smash era was a decade ago. Double standards much?

Well on ATRL dragging Gaga is allowed while not the other pop girls so...
OT: All pop girls are A list, Gaga is one of them.

[Giorgoc]

Originally posted by ScarletWitch

Well on ATRL dragging Gaga is allowed while not the other pop girls so...
OT: All pop girls are A list, Gaga is one of them.

I think we should be flattered tbh, it shows that people were so pressed by Gaga's domination waiting YEARS to find a chance to drag her AND that Gaga is the only one held to these insanely high standards.

Ha power tbh.

[B'Day]

Originally posted by umich

Yes. Just because "ARTPOP underperformed!!!11!:&2&:!!," it doesn't make her any less of her current celebrity status. Some of yall need to look past this site and see into the real world.

This. Some of you are unbelievable