|
Poll: Is Katy a touring artist now?
View Poll Results: Is she?
|
yas roar legend k
|
|
61 |
57.01% |
nah henny shes circling the drain
|
|
46 |
42.99% |
Member Since: 3/6/2014
Posts: 13,097
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Infinite
Yes touring prism almost for three years to pass the 200mark. Kiiiiiiiii
|
? How is it three years when the tour started in May 2014 and its last announced dates are in March 2015. Thats not even 1 year
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 27,490
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Squall
But it is actually true...
|
The argument was not whetherit's true or not, reading comprehension again never change KatyCats
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/30/2010
Posts: 28,270
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KatyLegendperry
? How is it three years when the tour started in May 2014 and its last announced dates are in March 2015. Thats not even 1 year
|
There are some people on this site you just can't help.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 16,371
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dark_Lorde
That's not what a FORCE is bang up. A FORCE is not about the gross.
A FORCE is about a continious incline and momentum and that's what Katy has. Every tour has grossed more than the previous one. That's what a FORCE is. It's moved forward.
If an artist has only ever known a decline. If an artist's numbers have descreaed with every tour, they didn't have FORCE to take away in the first place.
|
By that logic, a person whose first three tours gross $20M, $25M and $30M respectively is a force compared to a person who grosses $400M, $375M, $200M who is not... but then again, we can't trust your Katy-related posts
A better indication of a touring force is perhaps an artist who despite an underperforming album can pull big numbers, such as Lady Gaga and Madonna. Obviously they're on different levels of touring pull (one being a new artist and one being a vintage act), but both have remarkable touring receipts thus far making them touring forces. If you agree with your logic, I hope Madge can top $305M with ha next tour, otherwise she'll have declined three tours in a row and cease being a touring force!
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/21/2011
Posts: 6,530
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 25,504
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TKO
Gaga has more star power now than Katy but Katy sells more albums, singles, tickets, receives awards and nominations, and more followers, plus a higher spot on Forbes?
ARTPOP wasn't even bigger than One Of The Boys in terms of album, airplay, single sales, let alone PRISM or TD.
|
Meghan, Lorde etc. also sell more records currently than Gaga, Britney and the likes.
Good logic.
Let me leave now <3
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/1/2014
Posts: 13,632
|
No. Sorry.
Although PWT has been a success for her, she would need to do consistently well in her next tour or more to be called a touring force.
1 successful tour after 7 years of being the industry does not make you a "touring force."
That isn't fair to the gorls who have been slaying in the touring dept. since the very beginning of their careers till now. (Beyonce, Gaga, Taylor etc.)
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 3,628
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mariano
Meghan, Lorde etc. also sell more records currently than Gaga, Britney and the likes.
Good logic.
Let me leave now <3
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 27,490
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TKO
Gaga has more star power now than Katy but Katy sells more albums, singles, tickets, receives awards and nominations, and more followers, plus a higher spot on Forbes?
ARTPOP wasn't even bigger than One Of The Boys in terms of album, airplay, single sales, let alone PRISM or TD.
|
You really don't understand the meaning of star power do you? Meghan, Sam Smith, etc.. Sold more records than ARTPOP but still Gaga's star power is bigger than all of them combined
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/1/2014
Posts: 13,632
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rusty
By that logic, a person whose first three tours gross $20M, $25M and $30M respectively is a force compared to a person who grosses $400M, $375M, $200M who is not... but then again, we can't trust your Katy-related posts
A better indication of a touring force is perhaps an artist who despite an underperforming album can pull big numbers, such as Lady Gaga and Madonna. Obviously they're on different levels of touring pull (one being a new artist and one being a vintage act), but both have remarkable touring receipts thus far making them touring forces. If you agree with your logic, I hope Madge can top $305M with ha next tour, otherwise she'll have declined three tours in a row and cease being a touring force!
|
THIS so much.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/30/2010
Posts: 28,270
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Thor
No. Sorry.
Although PWT has been a success for her, she would need to do consistently well in her next tour or more to be called a touring force.
1 successful tour after 7 years of being the industry does not make you a "touring force."
That isn't fair to the gorls who have been slaying in the touring dept. since the very beginning of their careers till now. (Beyonce, Gaga, Taylor etc.)
|
How isn't it "fair" or something? Who talked about fairness towards the other girls? How is grossing 150M+ (because this is where it is probably going to end at the very least) not being a touring force? Who said you needed to do it more than once to be considered as one?
Gosh those monsters...
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 3,628
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Scheiße.
You really don't understand the meaning of star power do you? Meghan, Sam Smith, etc.. Sold more records than ARTPOP but still Gaga's star power is bigger than all of them combined
|
What kind of logic? if you have bigger star power you need to SLAY at least in something.
Katy makes more money, sell more records, wins more awards, has more followers, sells more tickets. How is Gaga more powerful than her?
Oh wait, she just IS because her stans are saying it. Okay.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 3,183
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mariano
Meghan, Lorde etc. also sell more records currently than Gaga, Britney and the likes.
|
Everybody does at this point
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/7/2011
Posts: 41,996
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mariano
You and me both know that 1 tour doesn't make you a touring force.
500M gross in 6 years is what makes you a touring force.
200-250M in 7 years (because PRISM will finish next year) does not make you a touring force.
I thought longevity was important, NO ?
|
It does and that's what the monsters said after the monster ball, literally just stop trying it.
And if Katy adds more dates (most likely) she will gross over 200m from this tour alone.
Seethe over this success that you never expected.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/1/2014
Posts: 13,632
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Squall
How isn't it "fair" or something? Who talked about fairness towards the other girls? How is grossing 150M+ (because this is where it is probably going to end at the very least) not being a touring force? Who said you needed to do it more than once to be considered as one?
Gosh those monsters...
|
It isn't fair bcoz those gorls have earned their "Touring Force" titles by slaying in the touring from their very first tours to even now.
Katy just had her 1st successful tour after being 7 years in the industry. Even though thats progress, it doesn't make her a touring force right away.
Nobody thought Gaga was a touring force from MBT...it was when she grossed 182 million from 98 shows...thats when everyone was like "Wow this girl is really killing it."
Same with Beyonce, Taylor & Rihanna, somewhat.
So Katy would have to have a similar grossing or more successful tour to prove that she is actually consistent and officially touring force & not just someone who had a successful tour bcoz of TD or Roar & DH.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 2,302
|
yes she is her tour is enjoyable and her hits are strong so why not she is not the best singer but 3/4 of the pop girls in the past are not great singers, i don't like her but this is it!
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/7/2011
Posts: 41,996
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Scheiße.
Never change KatyCats
|
It's actually true though, only monsters think she's still some huge pop star.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 27,490
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TKO
What kind of logic? if you have bigger star power you need to SLAY at least in something.
Katy makes more money, sell more records, wins more awards, has more followers, sells more tickets. How is Gaga more powerful than her?
Oh wait, she just IS because her stans are saying it. Okay.
|
Katy is your fav of course you will say her star power is bigger but what about Meghan, Sam and Iggy etc...
Are you telling me that they have more star power than Gaga ???
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/4/2014
Posts: 2,156
|
Quote:
Originally posted by superhunter
Grammy says hi
|
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 11/5/2011
Posts: 100,491
|
|
|
|
|
|