Quote:
Originally posted by -Lewymocha-
No it isnt. She had no participation in the production of the songs. She lent her vocals to another person's art, if this is how she gets her "hit" albums through movies and other people's work, then she's far worse off than I ever though she had gone. Poor Xtina
And it's so sad her fans have downgraded her to soundtrack status because they have lost all faith in her solo appearances on future records.
|
Hahahaha, what a stupid explanation! LOL! " She had no participation in the
production of the songs", if it were that way, Britney Spears wouldn't have any albums. And Christina sings
8/10 songs of the album of a movie starred by her, that says it all. People buy that album because of Xtina. that's why only her songs entered the iTunes charts. I'm not even arguing this fact with you, it's just a fact that's one of her albums.
It's such a shame that Flopril's latest album is #41 on iTunes, and Xtina's Burlesque album released over 4 months ago is #10.