|
News: Hillary Will Not Be Indicted, Sorry Girlies.
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 11/14/2008
Posts: 24,988
|
Quote:
Originally posted by NE.
The sheep in this thread.
Like ya'll are cheering on someone who illegally communicated classified and top secret information through private servers and then proceeded to DELETE the evidence, including information regarding an attack the KILLED innocent Americans, as if it's like some kind Billboard Hot 100 accomplishment. I really fear for the future of this country.
|
Killed innocent Americans? Jesus Christ, you actually believe she wanted those poor men killed? Newsflash, the deaths of the Americans in Benghazi should be on the hands of those that killed them. If we want to talk about considerable blame for poor security, look no further than your GOP Senate majority. They voted against the State Department's budget which requested for funds to supply adequate and sufficient intel. Instead, Hillary had to work with what little she was given, spreading said resources out among her men and women overseas who report to her as US Ambassadors. Then they have the nerve to get pissy about her not sending more security. HOW SWAY? Nevermind her originally scheduled visit to the same place that was attacked; it was suppose to occur a month later. Plus, when you serve as a foreign Ambassador in places like the middle east, you understand the major risks you're placing on yourself when doing so. It comes with the job.
It's disgusting to place those four deaths on her solely like that and label Hillary as a murderer and killer. People who do so, they look foolish and reckless. Trying to be sensationalists by throwing out morally damaging accusations, such as that.
Trust, there are no "sheep" over here. We recognize she isn't a perfect candidate to serve in public office, but anyone who thinks that such a person exists, are being completely delusional. The real sheep are people who believe and fall hook, line and sinker for 3 decades worth of attacks on a woman who dared to fight for universal healthcare and be married to the man whom she is married to while serving in public office.
Y'all can use the little shady remarks, here and there. For Hillary to have charges brought up against her by the FBI, they would have had to find WILLING intent to do harm with the release of top secret info and purposely doing so. It's extremely hard to prove such a thing unless she says flat out, "Hey Barack, what are your thoughts on the classified info attached to this document?" And it's SOOOOO ironic that you neglect to mention that the little emails that were marked "top secret" or "classified," were done so retroactively by the State Department. Just like when their emails are made for public record, that info served no harm at the time, but years later are removed from public viewing due to them being retroactively marked as classified info. Although, I know this is all falling on death's ears, so I'll take my departure now.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/12/2012
Posts: 7,989
|
Is anyone shocked? We've known she wasn't going to get indicted for a while now.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/12/2012
Posts: 7,989
|
foxaylove just spilled the tea on Benghazi. Anyone that wants to claim that Hillary is a murderer for that tragedy is willfully ignorant and willing to cast blame simply for some bizarre hatred of Hillary Clinton that already existed. After NINE investigations, with the most recent one being a heavily partisan attack on her campaign, revealing absolutely nothing... How can you make such ******** claims that Hillary murdered those men? If the Republicans found ANYTHING to attack her on, they would be working to make sure everyone on the planet was aware. But, they begrudgingly had to admit they could not find anything. Further, the family of the ambassador that died in those attacks does not even want this to go against Hillary Clinton and noted that he was aware of the risks but wanted to be there. If you are serving in the military (especially in the Middle East), there is a clear and obvious risk that goes along with it. While it is unfortunate that those four men died, they were not civilians. The risk they faced and the tragedy that resulted comes with the job. That's very blunt and uncomfortable for some to say, but it's the truth.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 165
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Reza
This literally makes no sense unless Hillary had the ability to time travel and know that those files would be marked classified at a later time but do you sis.
|
Well even still she knew about Benghazi and what it was, and emailed her daughter about it being terror attack, but continued to blame it on some cheap soft core egyptian ****.
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 3/1/2007
Posts: 19,847
|
Foxay and Bloo dragging with actual facts. Love it.
#HRC2016
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/6/2011
Posts: 31,849
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sloppy Flop
Well even still she knew about Benghazi and what it was, and emailed her daughter about it being terror attack, but continued to blame it on some cheap soft core egyptian ****.
|
What? Sis do yourself a favor and stop watching fox news.
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/10/2012
Posts: 14,915
|
Quote:
Originally posted by foxaylove
Killed innocent Americans? Jesus Christ, you actually believe she wanted those poor men killed? Newsflash, the deaths of the Americans in Benghazi should be on the hands of those that killed them. If we want to talk about considerable blame for poor security, look no further than your GOP Senate majority. They voted against the State Department's budget which requested for funds to supply adequate and sufficient intel. Instead, Hillary had to work with what little she was given, spreading said resources out among her men and women overseas who report to her as US Ambassadors. Then they have the nerve to get pissy about her not sending more security. HOW SWAY? Nevermind her originally scheduled visit to the same place that was attacked; it was suppose to occur a month later. Plus, when you serve as a foreign Ambassador in places like the middle east, you understand the major risks you're placing on yourself when doing so. It comes with the job.
It's disgusting to place those four deaths on her solely like that and label Hillary as a murderer and killer. People who do so, they look foolish and reckless. Trying to be sensationalists by throwing out morally damaging accusations, such as that.
Trust, there are no "sheep" over here. We recognize she isn't a perfect candidate to serve in public office, but anyone who thinks that such a person exists, are being completely delusional. The real sheep are people who believe and fall hook, line and sinker for 3 decades worth of attacks on a woman who dared to fight for universal healthcare and be married to the man whom she is married to while serving in public office.
Y'all can use the little shady remarks, here and there. For Hillary to have charges brought up against her by the FBI, they would have had to find WILLING intent to do harm with the release of top secret info and purposely doing so. It's extremely hard to prove such a thing unless she says flat out, "Hey Barack, what are your thoughts on the classified info attached to this document?" And it's SOOOOO ironic that you neglect to mention that the little emails that were marked "top secret" or "classified," were done so retroactively by the State Department. Just like when their emails are made for public record, that info served no harm at the time, but years later are removed from public viewing due to them being retroactively marked as classified info. Although, I know this is all falling on death's ears, so I'll take my departure now.
|
Omg
|
|
|
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 11/14/2008
Posts: 24,988
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bloo
foxaylove just spilled the tea on Benghazi. Anyone that wants to claim that Hillary is a murderer for that tragedy is willfully ignorant and willing to cast blame simply for some bizarre hatred of Hillary Clinton that already existed. After NINE investigations, with the most recent one being a heavily partisan attack on her campaign, revealing absolutely nothing... How can you make such ******** claims that Hillary murdered those men? If the Republicans found ANYTHING to attack her on, they would be working to make sure everyone on the planet was aware. But, they begrudgingly had to admit they could not find anything. Further, the family of the ambassador that died in those attacks does not even want this to go against Hillary Clinton and noted that he was aware of the risks but wanted to be there. If you are serving in the military (especially in the Middle East), there is a clear and obvious risk that goes along with it. While it is unfortunate that those four men died, they were not civilians. The risk they faced and the tragedy that resulted comes with the job. That's very blunt and uncomfortable for some to say, but it's the truth.
|
Benghazi pisses me off. Why? Because that committee was created because of Republicans, who led an investigation that lasted TWO YEARS and used $7 million of the tax payers money to fund it. The 9/11 terrorist attacks and JFK assassination investigations didn't even last that long. WTH? Basically, the GOP used Americans to fund their 2 year long attack campaign ad against their rival party's inevitable Presidential nominee. Tax payers funded a 2 year witch hunt. We've always had US Ambassadors under attack and killed under the past 4 Presidents and Secretary of States and not one of them were held as such public beating horses in the manner that Hillary was. Under George W. Bush's stint, we had 13 embassies under attack and 60 deaths. Did we hold Condoleezza Rice or General Colin Powell under fire and had 2 year long investigations of those killings? No? OH!
For 11 freaking hours, Hillary sat through a politically motivated character attack on national television. Don't forget, the Republicans didn't even want that hearing to be publicized, but the Democrats fought them to the bitter end and got it openly covered; we deserved to know what I money was funding and being used for. Republicans knew nothing would come of this, but they did it anyways. And in a lot of ways, their mission was successful. Ignorant comments about Hillary killing those four men are often tossed around like candy in a parade.
We should demand the GOP give the American people a REFUND. That money could've been allocated to something much more productive, especially when we have homeless/jobless vets in our streets.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 2,555
|
It sucks that conservative talking points like emails and Benghazi will give neoliberals grounds to build Clinton up, with both distracting everyone from important issues like the rapidly growing amount of drone strikes the US orders or how many innocent immigrants it continues to deport. Or the literal billions of tax payer money it hands over to Israel to continue its genocide on Palestine.
It doesn't matter who is at the helm of America because not one person can stop the evil the country commits. The "lessor evil" argument doesn't work when the evil is the machine, not who guides it. Even someone like Obama, who has a decent domestic policy and improved on the failures of 8 years of a Republican, is basically no different than a Republican when it comes to his foreign policy. America will continue committing crimes across the world to ensure its place in the world remains what it is. That's what Americans are voting for - to ensure things in their bubble improve; all options will still see the horrors committed outside of that bubble continued.
Sadly it's going from a leader who regretted being complicit to such crimes to one who pushes for these things with glee.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/12/2012
Posts: 7,989
|
Quote:
Originally posted by foxaylove
Benghazi pisses me off. Why? Because that committee was created because of Republicans, who led an investigation that lasted TWO YEARS and used $7 million of the tax payers money to fund it. The 9/11 terrorist attacks and JFK assassination investigations didn't even last that long. WTH? Basically, the GOP used Americans to fund their 2 year long attack campaign ad against their rival party's inevitable Presidential nominee. Tax payers funded a 2 year witch hunt. We've always had US Ambassadors under attack and killed under the past 4 Presidents and Secretary of States and not one of them were held as such public beating horses in the manner that Hillary was. Under George W. Bush's stint, we had 13 embassies under attack and 60 deaths. Did we hold Condoleezza Rice or General Colin Powell under fire and had 2 year long investigations of those killings? No? OH!
For 11 freaking hours, Hillary sat through a politically motivated character attack on nationally television. Don't forget, the Republicans didn't even want that hearing to be publicized, but the Democrats fought them to the bitter end and got it openly covered on television. Because we deserved to know what I money was funding and being used for. Republicans knew nothing would come of this, but they did it anyways. And in a lot of ways, their mission was successful. Ignorant comments about Hillary killing those four men are often tossed around like candy in a parade.
We should demand the GOP give the American people a REFUND. That money could've been allocated to something much more productive, especially when we have homeless/jobless vets in our streets.
|
The most telling aspect of the entire investigation is that the GOP quit talking about it when it was shown that Hillary's poll numbers went up after the 11 hour trial. The entire investigation was nothing more than a pathetic attempt to attack Hillary Clinton because they're scared to death of her. Nothing more, nothing less. It's so pathetic. This the same party that shut down the entire federal government over Obamacare and impeached President Bill Clinton.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/31/2013
Posts: 6,189
|
Did anyone except the most deluded bern victims think she'd get indicted? It was never really happening
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike91
Just because you wouldn't have to live with President Trump, doesn't mean you should wish him on the rest of us.
|
He lives under Erdogan though....
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 14,321
|
Reddit right now:
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 10,242
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Khal
Did anyone except the most deluded bern victims think she'd get indicted? It was never really happening
He lives under Erdogan though....
|
Literally every Republican thought she'd get indicted as well
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 2/3/2012
Posts: 10,340
|
Quote:
Originally posted by LuLuDrops
Reddit right now:
|
Poor them. TAW
See y'all in November!
|
|
|
|
|