Quote:
Originally posted by atrlster
Since when did GHs have to be platinum to be considered the lowest threshold for success? Get with the program "sweetie". The standards have changed. It's not about your first or second GH, but about the time period. You do realize that platinum now means more than it did in 2004 right? lol
I showed how Britney's GHs didnt sell as well as you thought they did for their time period. And how KGB did decently well for its period. Do you even know how many other GHs it did better than? If you really think KGB did so badly, what do you consider those other GHs?
And what does the Army living in the past have to do with this? Their inability to move forward is irrelevant to this discussion
And your WW argument might fly, if not for the fact that this entire discussions stems from stuff you responded to concerning USA stats
Look back on the last page if you want to relive your excuses
|
The standards have changed but still not that much that going gold is considered a success. Again look at PINKs sales. Keeps getting better flopped in comparison. And yes pink had two hits that helped with her sales, but numbers are still numbers. As I said xtina flopped with both her single and album.
You're bringing up the past. I'm talking about the current sales. I could care less about how much it sold back in 2004
stop living in the past sweetie, and embrace the current stats x
I may have replied to quotes where the US sales were mentioned, but I never brought them up nor did I comment on them, hence why I kept saying stuff like: "Britney's Gh sold as much as Eminems" , "celebration outsold keeps getting better" - I was clearly talking about the ww sales.
And I just went back a page and saw that I never once denied that the singles collection flopped. You're putting words in my mouth sweetie. I find it pathetic that you feel the need to come up with stuff in a desperate attempt to win an argument lmfao.