[MissedTheTrain]

Except it isn't even the same vocal melody. Sorry, retromaury.

[Salacious]

Why are her fans so desperate to keep her name associated with Gaga's?

[Lover]

Originally posted by Salacious

Why are her fans so desperate to keep her name associated with Gaga's?

it's the new york times not ha fans

[Stitches.]

Madonna's impact will always live on Gaga, so I'm not surprised

[Heisenberg]

I actually thought this the first time I listened to it

[Salacious]

Originally posted by Lover

it's the new york times not ha fans

No, it's one writer who happens to write for the NYT. His opinion doesn't reflect the opinion of the entire company, and I was referring to her fans in this thread (with petty avatars like yours) and the ones that run those scary, obsessive blogs.

[Danny789]

Wait!!!!!! They're right

[Swine]

Sugar don't bite
Just take me far with you
All through the night (the night)
I bet you taste sweeter

Sugar don't bite
I just want to please you
Don't make me beg ya'
Don't make me tease ya, no

Sugar don't bite
You know I'm a bleeder
Don't make this boy a (this boy)
Little misdeamenor, no

Sugar don't bite
Just sprinkle it on me
Do what ya' can, oh (do what ya can) ( to me)
Do what ya' can to me

[jhn__]

both sound very similar.

[Qwerty1234]

Originally posted by Salacious

No, it's one writer who happens to write for the NYT. His opinion doesn't reflect the opinion of the entire company, and I was referring to her fans in this thread (with petty avatars like yours) and the ones that run those scary, obsessive blogs.

This doesn't make any sense since a company can't have an opinion.
Even if you took the opinions of everyone who worked there, it would still be a collection of individual opinions.
This guy's work is presented not as his own, but via the New York Times which means it represents what the NYT "thinks" about the song.

[Salacious]

Originally posted by Qwerty1234

This doesn't make any sense since a company can't have an opinion.
Even if you took the opinions of everyone who worked there, it would still be a collection of individual opinions.
This guy's work is presented not as his own, but via the New York Times which means it represents what the NYT "thinks" about the song.

There's a reason many companies require that you add a disclaimer to your social media pages if you make it publicly known that you work for them. However, that's not my point. My question was why some Madonna fans are so obsessed with keeping her name associated with Gaga's, and that user told me that it's not her fans, but the NYT, which is simply false.

[dabunique]

Originally posted by Salacious

There's a reason many companies require that you add a disclaimer to your social media pages if you make it publicly known that you work for them. However, that's not my point. My question was why some Madonna fans are so obsessed with keeping her name associated with Gaga's, and that user told me that it's not her fans, but the NYT, which is simply false.

Once again y would any respectable Madonna, da only queen of pop, fan would want ha name associated with GaGa?

obviously bringing up Madonna has been a sour note for some monsters like urself. NYT knows how to tug at ur wigs and get y'all to be mad

I for one don't hear PDP, but i as well wouldn't want PDP compared to this flop of a song

[Salacious]

Originally posted by dabunique

Once again y would any respectable Madonna, da only queen of pop, fan would want ha name associated with GaGa?

obviously bringing up Madonna has been a sour note for some monsters like urself. NYT knows how to tug at ur wigs and get y'all to be mad

I for one don't hear PDP, but i as well wouldn't want PDP compared to this flop of a song

I'm not a monster, so I'm asking from the outside looking in, lol. It happens a lot. A Madonna fan posted this thread for a reason.

[Cruel World]

What kind of reach because of like 3 seconds of a song.

Madonna would love to be Gaga, otherwise she wouldn't have reacted to Gaga so poorly back then.
And now the only mention she gets is because of Gaga...

[puffpuffpass626]

Originally posted by Cruel World

What kind of reach because of like 3 seconds of a song.

Madonna would love to be Gaga, otherwise she wouldn't have reacted to Gaga so poorly back then.
And now the only mention she gets is because of Gaga...

Delusional

[dabunique]

Originally posted by Cruel World

What kind of reach because of like 3 seconds of a song.

Madonna would love to be Gaga, otherwise she wouldn't have reacted to Gaga so poorly back then.
And now the only mention she gets is because of Gaga...

LOL, please

[Bencharmer]

Originally posted by Cruel World

What kind of reach because of like 3 seconds of a song.

Madonna would love to be Gaga, otherwise she wouldn't have reacted to Gaga so poorly back then.
And now the only mention she gets is because of Gaga...

Delete your account

[LemonadeKing]

Originally posted by maat

Would the most influential newspaper in the world lie.
I guess you can't bribe some publications...

[LemonadeKing]

Originally posted by Cruel World

What kind of reach because of like 3 seconds of a song.

Madonna would love to be Gaga, otherwise she wouldn't have reacted to Gaga so poorly back then.
And now the only mention she gets is because of Gaga...

This just makes the free fall that much more hilarious

[Skins]

At this point she can release literally anything and old men working at flopping newspapers will write some dumb ass article on how it sounds like Madonna and the Gaga haters will eat it up. Please