Quote:
Originally posted by Trent W
I've said a lot of times, is a very good album, but the critics are biased as ****, is not a 94.
ST was better and a lot more consistent with the quality of sound. This new album has the visuals and nice tracks, but experimental and cheap sounds are very easy to confuse these days.
|
At the end of the day we all have our opinions, just like critics, they don't have to be biased, because they actually could find it that briliiant, just like you have the odd opinion in comparison that is sounds cheap. ST was better to you, fine
.
Hopefully better than Dangerously in Love which isn't even that old yet.
