Quote:
Originally posted by PopBoi
That's what I'm talking about. You don't like her tone. Its like marmite and everyone will tell you that. But she is a good singer.
It doesn't matter what your opinions are of their music, you dont ever like her, they came from the some cheap council estate (ironically like Cheryl) and worked their way up from nothing. And you cant do that without talent, it doesn't matter what you think of their music. The fact is they were successful and Tulisa is a success solo. You dont last if you dont have some form of talent. And am still not over the Kim comparison ![Bibliotheque](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/atrlers/biblio_zps23dff242.gif)
|
1. Wrong. You can become incredibly famous when you a.) look good and b.) work alongside two other capable people
2. She has some vocal ability. It is not good enough for her to be glorified across the nation or asked to judge other people, all of whom are more talented than her.
3. Let me rephrase my argument: she has a level of talent. It is not a "celebrity" level of talent.
I don't hate
her, I just hate that she's famous. It's really petty but I wish actual extraordinary people could rise to her level of fame. Oh and the Kim thing.
![deadbanana](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/bananas/deadbanana2_zpsd45da7d4.gif)
In my mind, she's somewhat down there with Kim Kardashian because from what I know, KK has some level of business intuition. But not much.
I'm not saying all this stuff to be spiteful or anything, I'm using Tulisa as an example to express my frustration at the intellect of the majority of consumers. I'm literally just here for the music and occasional glorious personality. *kanyeshrug*
But sis, don't we usually get along? Pixie stans and all that?
![deadbanana](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/bananas/deadbanana2_zpsd45da7d4.gif)