[britneyboy45]

Jill Stein was a "Member of the Lexington Town Meeting from the 2nd district" in Massachusetts. THATS IT. even trump is more qualified from an executive point of view...

[vuelve88]

This could have been an opportunity to distance herself. A terrible move for Hillary. Nobody wants to see Debbie anymore.

[britneyboy45]

also the Hillary campaign just launched at app! "Hillary 2016"

[Gui Blackout]

I can't believe Jill posted that 91% to Hillary while her acting like she's her nemesis. What an idiot

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Ryan Bálor

DNC has no power over state elections. DNC is not responsible for more than 3.5 million more people choosing HRC over Bernard.

You can scream "rigged" you want but the outcome is the outcome. The people chose HRC.

You don't need to control the ballot box to sway an electorate, especially when you are supposed to be a neutral entity.

[Mike91]

Originally posted by Gui Blackout

I can't believe Jill posted that 91% to Hillary while her acting like she's her nemesis. What an idiot

Hillary's changed so many of her views though...

[Mike91]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

You don't need to control the ballot box to sway an electorate, especially when you are supposed to be a neutral entity.

The media collusion is proof of rigging. I knew channels like MSNBC were biased.

[Benzene]

95% of the country doesn't know who DWS is. Hell, most people in her district probably don't know who she is.

Bernie and his fans spent his entire campaign painting him as a victim, and this "RIGGED CONFIRMED" nonsense is an extension of that. Maybe if his people spent less time complaining about a stolen election and more time figuring out strategies to connect with minority voters (the ACTUAL reason he lost) then perhaps he'd have experienced a better result.

[iamvladd]

DWS out!

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Ryan Bálor

The DNC backed Hillary in 2007-08 and yet voters still chose Obama.

Irrelevant.

[Benzene]

Originally posted by Ryan Bálor

I'm amused at the people who have no idea how interviews and TV segments work, but yet want to scream collusion.

Like...how do these people think certain reporters get exclusives? Out of thin air?

[Mike91]

Originally posted by Benzene

95% of the country doesn't know who DWS is. Hell, most people in her district probably don't know who she is.

Bernie and his fans spent his entire campaign painting him as a victim, and this "RIGGED CONFIRMED" nonsense is an extension of that. Maybe if his people spent less time complaining about a stolen election and more time figuring out strategies to connect with minority voters (the ACTUAL reason he lost) then perhaps he'd have experienced a better result.

Bill Clinton broke a rule during the MA primary, the debates were scheduled during times when no one would watch, the media blackout at first, etc.

I don't think there was a HARD attempt at screwing Bernie over (minorities and the fact people thought Hillary was more electable - even though she's really not - screwed him over) but there was definitely bias and sketchy things going on during the primary. That cannot be denied.

[Harrier]

Hillary & the Democrats are way too overconfident, I mean re-hiring Debbie to campaign? Are they serious? I am getting very worried about this election.

[Mike91]

Originally posted by Ryan Bálor

I'm amused at the people who have no idea how interviews and TV segments work, but yet want to scream collusion.

[chilicheese01]

Originally posted by Ryan Bálor

The DNC backed Hillary in 2007-08 and yet voters still chose Obama.

So.... eight years ago? Lmao.

[Benzene]

Originally posted by Mike91

Bill Clinton broke a rule during the MA primary, the debates were scheduled during times when no one would watch, the media blackout at first, etc.

I don't think there was a HARD attempt at screwing Bernie over (minorities and the fact people thought Hillary was more electable - even though she's really not - screwed him over) but there was definitely bias and sketchy things going on during the primary. That cannot be denied.

The debates were all in primetime, when did people not have a chance to watch?

Bill Clinton being near a poling place was the reason he lost Mass (a state VERY friendly to him) by thousands of votes?

All of these things are just excuses to remove any culpability from the Sanders campaign and to explain away their mistakes. Bernie went into the campaign with the same strategy as HRC 2008, and he achieved the same result. If the DNC really wanted to screw him over they would've bounced him right after Super Tuesday.

[Mike91]

People do know the emails were from the DNC and not Clinton's actual campaign right? That's the controversy. It's not like someone leaked emails from Clinton's camp. It was from the DNC, who were supposed to stay neutral but were coming up with ways to hurt Bernie. And they were colluding with the media, being given stories about Clinton from Politico prior to them being published, etc.

[Gui Blackout]

Do people really think that Bernie only lost because of the DNC?

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Ryan Bálor

My point being it doesn't matter who the DNC favors when the VOTERS are the ones who have the say.

It does matter. Their actions directly influence voters. Nothing to do with a narrative.

[Benzene]

Originally posted by Gui Blackout

Do people really think that Bernie only lost because of the DNC?

Far left people can't fathom that minorities don't give a **** about THE BIG BANKS.

To his credit Mike91 isn't saying that, but a lot of Bernouts legitimately believe this.