Quote:
Originally posted by coolcristobal
It'd just look...too outlandish  I realize that we're talking about Pokemon here and most Pokemon look outlandish, but a bipedal fox <<<<<<<<
And I see nothing wrong with re-using concepts and such, as long as they all look different and flawless at the end. |
Zoroark >>>>>>>>>>> Ninetales
You may not see something wrong but a lot of other people do. They even complained that Fennekin is a Vulpix knock off
Quote:
Originally posted by Brunette Ambition
Not people saying that others would have complained when Fennekings evo would have been a bad ass fox on 4 legs when Froakie is like the 8th frog and nobody complained.
 |
There are 3 frog Pokemon (Toads and Frogs aren't the same just like Dogs, Wolfs and Foxes aren't the same) And none of the frog Pokemon look like FRoakie or its evo. I agree that the fake one that was posted a few pages back looks like Toxicroak but like i said it is fake. People barely have a problem with using the same Animal but with similar designs. Using a Kyubi (especially for another fire type) would make many people angry
Quote:
Originally posted by coolcristobal
I'm 100% sure Fletchling will end up another basic, forgettable and generic Normal/Flying type Pokemon you can catch at the beginning. 
I kinda like his design though. |
Thank god that Talonflame is already confirmed to be fire/Flying
)