|
Poll: Gaga or Britney: Who's New music is needed the most in pop?
View Poll Results: ????
|
Britney's
|
![](images/polls/bar2-l.gif) ![](images/polls/bar2.gif) ![](images/polls/bar2-r.gif)
|
62 |
42.47% |
Gaga's
|
![](images/polls/bar3-l.gif) ![](images/polls/bar3.gif) ![](images/polls/bar3-r.gif)
|
62 |
42.47% |
Both tbh
|
![](images/polls/bar4-l.gif) ![](images/polls/bar4.gif) ![](images/polls/bar4-r.gif)
|
10 |
6.85% |
Neither, Next!
|
![](images/polls/bar5-l.gif) ![](images/polls/bar5.gif) ![](images/polls/bar5-r.gif)
|
12 |
8.22% |
Member Since: 12/27/2011
Posts: 20,704
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Eternium
Your fave just ripped the Weeknd for an entire album and you have the audacity to throw "generic" around left-and-right ![lmao](http://atrl.net/forums/images/smilies/images/smilies/lmao.gif) And then to try and bring up rehashing old choreos ![skull](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/faces/skull_zpsksni5fmm.gif) Lord, I pray you get the help you so desperately need
Anyway, Gaga has two good albums (one of which is an EP) anf Britney has seven. Gaga has 10 great videos and Britney has 30. I have no reason to believe Gaga will come back with another great record, especially when she's trend chasing producers like Mark Ronson. I hope she proves me wrong, though.
|
ARTPOP is Gaga's worst album and it's better than every Britney album sans Blackout and In the Zone.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 26,316
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aden
No, they agree that with him because Gaga's recurrent sales are much higher and she has had a lot more relevant moments this year.
|
You can't really argue w/ him. I've never seen someone as delusional as him. He's the one who told me Britney was more popular than Taylor Swift in 2014. I mean, it's rather sad at this point. I bet he could claim Britney was somewhat bigger than Adele in 2015 and seriously mean it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/5/2014
Posts: 15,092
|
Britney.
Gaga was never needed & her presence is not missed.
The GP disposed of her after a short time for a reason.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 32,982
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aden
This is more along the lines of what I think. If we ask the question "what does pop music need right now?", the answer is probably more ambitious work. Out of the two, Gaga is more likely to deliver ambitious work.
Britney has always been a generic pop artist. A successful one, but generic.
No, they agree that with him because Gaga's recurrent sales are much higher and she has had a lot more relevant moments this year.
|
Britney has actually been ahead of trends. Gaga was a year late to the electro-pop trend and has not innovated since.
Britney's actually charted this year with her GH. Where is Gaga? And Gaga's actually released a pop single this year, TIHTY, and it sold less than any Britney single ever despite an Oscar's performance. I can guarantee you that Britney's first single she releases this year will smash what Gaga's has done ![@michael.](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/atrlers/micheal_zps45ccf519.gif)
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 3,804
|
As Lady GaGa says, ''Britney Spears is the queen of pop'' so her music must be more needed
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/24/2011
Posts: 3,581
|
Gaga, I'm really hoping that ARTPOP was just a misstep and not an indication of her future music. I think she has the better chance of bringing something fresh to the table.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/27/2011
Posts: 20,704
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Eternium
Britney has actually been ahead of trends. Gaga was a year late to the electro-pop trend and has not innovated since.
Britney's actually charted this year with her GH. Where is Gaga? And Gaga's actually released a pop single this year, TIHTY, and it sold less than any Britney single ever despite an Oscar's performance. I can guarantee you that Britney's first single she releases this year will smash what Gaga's has done ![@michael.](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/atrlers/micheal_zps45ccf519.gif)
|
ddddd lemme guess, Blackout invented electro pop music.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 32,982
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aden
ARTPOP is Gaga's worst album and it's better than every Britney album sans Blackout and In the Zone.
|
ARTPOP is barely better than Britney Jean. Only three songs have any form of replay value and she ****ed up the promising demos for the album (see: Sexxx Dreams).
I used to stan Gaga till BTW came around but she has only given me ~10 good songs this decade from three albums. There is no reason to eagerly anticipate her next record, though I really hope she surprises me.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/18/2012
Posts: 15,751
|
d at this poll being so cut throat ![dies](images/smilies/images/smilies/dies.gif)
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/1/2014
Posts: 5,368
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Violet Skye
Oh please. Gaga has always had this agenda of latching on to what's hot at the moment like the fashion world. They got over her real quick once they started to see how quickly she declined. It was catastrophic.
The only reason why Gaga did Cheek To Cheek is because she wanted a reason to stay relevant in some little way... be a "critical darling" or whatever. It was a quick save. No relevant or hot girl would ever do a project like that so quickly or early in their careers.
|
Whether it was marketing or not, C2C was the opportunity of a lifetime for a girl like Gaga (plus considering how frail Tony is lol). If everyone wrote her off for doing pop music/dance, what else was she supposed to do? It came at the right time
She seems to have a better insight in life overall due to a personal relationship as well
TF - ARTPOP were full of behind the scenes moments. Drugs, personal problems, oversexposure. Most of her fault, some not. She still has that ego though but she wouldn't be here without it
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/9/2012
Posts: 13,858
|
We need 2009-2011 Gaga back
We need 1998-2004 Britney back
Britney has been slaying the game this year dancing again like she did during her peak (not the same but close). Gaga on the other hand, well we don't know if she's going to make generic edm music again.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 6,425
|
Quote:
Originally posted by americanshameless
You said the GP only want authentic music, now you're going in circles.
Yes people bought PANDA because they saw how much passion it entailed. Yes people bought WFH because they saw how music PAIN it embodied. Etc you lost that argument.
Now with what Britney's music has to bring to the table? Something far more exciting that Gaga's judging by the GP's interests which happens to be the main basis of your argument!
Like ![rip](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRLSmilies/rip_zpsec10ede9.gif) Stick to pitting yalls so-called fave against Katy Perry ![lmao](http://atrl.net/forums/images/smilies/images/smilies/lmao.gif)
|
Lol you guys are so delusional. Britney will not make it sis. Just accept it. Make Me is supposed to be like some remix or something. She's literally not bringing anything new.
Britney has always been a generic pop artist. A successful one, but generic.
Quote:
Originally posted by Eternium
Your fave just ripped the Weeknd for an entire album and you have the audacity to throw "generic" around left-and-right ![lmao](http://atrl.net/forums/images/smilies/images/smilies/lmao.gif) And then to try and bring up rehashing old choreos ![skull](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/faces/skull_zpsksni5fmm.gif) Lord, I pray you get the help you so desperately need ![lmao](http://atrl.net/forums/images/smilies/images/smilies/lmao.gif)
|
Now you know that's a lie. Don't Hurt yourself is generic? Stop. Britney is generic. She's not a bad artist just a basic one.
"This is more along the lines of what I think. If we ask the question "what does pop music need right now?", the answer is probably more ambitious work. Out of the two, Gaga is more likely to deliver ambitious work.
Britney has always been a generic pop artist. A successful one, but generic."
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/5/2014
Posts: 15,092
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aden
ddddd lemme guess, Blackout invented electro pop music.
|
You say this as if Little Monsters don't credit Gaga for this with The Fame. ![toofunny2](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/faces/toofunny2_zpsb54f2d2d.gif)
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 9/14/2010
Posts: 78,921
|
Gaga
Britney is undeniably a pop icon but her services are no longer required
We cannot as a society belittle Beyoncé and most recently, Bieber for lipsyncing and then.. well.
That's my reason!
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 32,982
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aden
ddddd lemme guess, Blackout invented electro pop music.
|
I like how you say that yet genuinely believe The Fame started the trend
Britney's first venture into the genre was 2001 and she was working on it prior to "Music's" release. ![lmao](http://atrl.net/forums/images/smilies/images/smilies/lmao.gif) She delved much deeper in to it by 2003, still 6 years before everyone and their grandma was doing it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/27/2004
Posts: 3,188
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bulldog
Lol you guys are so delusional. Britney will not make it sis. Just accept it. Make Me is supposed to be like some remix or something. She's literally not bringing anything new.
Britney has always been a generic pop artist. A successful one, but generic.
Now you know that's a lie. Don't Hurt yourself is generic? Stop. Britney is generic. She's not a bad artist just a basic one.
"This is more along the lines of what I think. If we ask the question "what does pop music need right now?", the answer is probably more ambitious work. Out of the two, Gaga is more likely to deliver ambitious work.
Britney has always been a generic pop artist. A successful one, but generic."
|
Generic artists fade. Britney's music has always been special and memorable. Perhaps she may work with some generic producers but Britney has the ability to elevate a song like no other. There's a fine line and there's a reason why she is here to stay. Like my sig says, "Been there, done that, and will do it again".
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 4,871
|
I love me some Britney. But it's obvious her time has passed and she's clearly not invested in her own career. For crying out loud, she's got no artistry. Whatever she "sings" in the studio these days isn't really going to change the industry or be appreciated. Her latest efforts have flopped and people just sympathize with her because she's clearly a puppet. Even if she did return with a strong, interesting comeback, she wouldn't really stand a chance cause there are dozens of younger female pop stars with more charisma and control than she has.
Gaga has much more potential than Britney by eons. They shouldn't even be compared. She may not be as popular as she was before but she has always had more talent and creativity than Britney ever had in ha life.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/27/2011
Posts: 20,704
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Baby Boy
You say this as if Little Monsters don't credit Gaga for this with The Fame. ![toofunny2](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/faces/toofunny2_zpsb54f2d2d.gif)
|
Considering dance pop dominated from 2009 to 2012, it makes more sense that an album from 2008 pushed that kind of music into the mainstream than an album from 2007.
Also notice how numerous songs from that era sounded closer to the Fame Monster than anything from Blackout. ![@michael.](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/korn0818/ATRL_Smilies_All/atrlers/micheal_zps45ccf519.gif)
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 8,937
|
Britney Spears.
Lady Gaga hasn't really brought anything fresh in over half a decade (ARTPOP was a dated mess, C2C was jazz, BTW was kind of a throwback album so of course nothing new there).
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/28/2011
Posts: 19,165
|
I'll give Gaga the credit that TF did help elevate the dance pop craze, not completely but she was one of the first pop artists that popularised it in a typa way. However, that's where it ends. I mean you have AP, which sounds way too sonically similar to her debut, 10 years ago.
And you can't be telling me that's what "Gaga" was all about prior fame when you have her singing jazz on coffee shops pre-stardom + that one interview where they expose her team and the marketing to elevate Stefani. And since she's still making the same type of music, the "authenticity" argument will never be understood by me. She's a good performer with good live renditions otherwise, her music just isn't anything as fresh as y'all hype her ass to be.
|
|
|
|
|