GIRLS. GIRLS. GUYS. Stan goggles aside. Embedded hatred ASIDE.
How can you actually AGREE with this article without losing ALL credibility?
Quote:
So in truth, Katy Perry is exactly the kind of safe, nonthreatening, middle-of-the-road nothingburger that every candidate wants in their camp: one who sometimes feels like a plastic bag, but solves this problem not by regulating plastic-bag use or declaring war on global-warming apologists, but by focusing on something idealistic and imaginary and frankly, stupid: A FIREWORK.
|
She literally thinks Katy should take on the job title of Environmental Engineer as a pop star.
Quote:
She takes everything at face value. Katy Perry would never disavow fame like Lorde or embrace fame like Swift or ask "Miley, what's good?" like Nicki Minaj.
|
She is dragging Katy for being ****ING nice, like did y'all see this? The thing half of ATRL was dragging Nicki over?
Quote:
Katy Perry's intention to campaign for Hillary Clinton suggests nothing more than the fact that Katy Perry would prefer to sound like someone who stands for something, even though she isn't that person and never has been. It's a nice try.
|
Paraphrased: "Wow, look at Katy Perry backing a democrat in our deeply divided and polarized political climate! Instead of being anonymous politically, she's actually using her voice! Hm... that means she stands for absolutely NOTHING!
If you think the article is worth its weight, you're simply pressed. Sorry gyals