Katy has nothing to be upset about given the fact PRISM was a major success, and is currently in Australia making $3 Million+ a night, getting ready to take on the biggest event of the year. But do you.
I wish katy would actually say something to taylor.
I would live for that feud. None of this current pop music feuds where artists just casually throw subtle shade.
I want teeth flying, blood curling, "hold-my-earrings" styled beat downs.
Not clinging to anything, just stating a fact. Just like you stated that most pop songs have repetition. But that doesn't mean that you can't work with them and form a nice melody instead of just being monotone. You know that Katy's vocals on WoA are better than Taylor's on OOTW, I know it, everyone knows it. So if we compare one repetitive chorus to another, Katy wins again.
Which brings it all back to the topic at hand. Taylor's 1989 is essentially PRISM lite.
That's subjective, you know this, everyone knows this. So stop trying to press your opinions off as facts and grow up a little.
Not clinging to anything, just stating a fact. Just like you stated that most pop songs have repetition. But that doesn't mean that you can't work with them and form a nice melody instead of just being monotone. You know that Katy's vocals on WoA are better than Taylor's on OOTW, I know it, everyone knows it. So if we compare one repetitive chorus to another, Katy wins again.
Which brings it all back to the topic at hand. Taylor's 1989 is essentially PRISM lite.
Just like how OOTW is a better written song and better overall song. the reviews don't lie
I wish katy would actually say something to taylor.
I would live for that feud. None of this current pop music feuds where artists just casually throw subtle shade.
I want teeth flying, blood curling, "hold-my-earrings" styled beat downs.
Katy has nothing to be upset about given the fact PRISM was a major success, and is currently in Australia making $3 Million+ a night, getting ready to take on the biggest event of the year. But do you lol.
And the fact that most members here celebrating the Taylor vs Katy feud are stans of other lesser popstar
Not clinging to anything, just stating a fact. Just like you stated that most pop songs have repetition. But that doesn't mean that you can't work with them and form a nice melody instead of just being monotone. You know that Katy's vocals on WoA are better than Taylor's on OOTW, I know it, everyone knows it. So if we compare one repetitive chorus to another, Katy wins again.
Which brings it all back to the topic at hand. Taylor's 1989 is essentially PRISM lite.
Just like how OOTW is a better written song and better overall song. the reviews don't lie
not when Prism itself is Warrior lite
Not when PRISM itself is Teenage Dream rejects. Can't say the same for Swift and the other artists that the Kats compulsively attack.
The absolue lies. WoA is the superior song but that is just a huge ass fib stop playing. Her vocals on WoA is the single reason why that song is not perfect
It's actually the opposite.
Quote:
Originally posted by theworldfamous
That's subjective, you know this, everyone knows this. So stop trying to press your opinions off as facts and grow up a little.
How is it subjective when Katy is singing more than one note, including notes that Taylor is physically incapable of singing?
Quote:
Originally posted by Dollas n Diamonds
Just like how OOTW is a better written song and better overall song. the reviews don't lie
not when Prism itself is Warrior lite
I prefer OOTW to Walking On Air actually. But Katy's vocals are better on WoA.
In my opinion, 1989 is universes above all of Katy's albums. They aren't even similar because Taylor put her style and approach on a vast majority of the album despite the more commercial sound. It's catchy music, but you're
listening to something that's actually quite well-written for a Pop song.