Quote:
Originally posted by Rusty
How could anyone with an open mind dismiss this as not art?
|
Quote:
Originally posted by HausOfCarlos
But why exactly? Just cause you didn't like it?
What if i showed you a painting and you wouldn't like it, it would be shocking and disgusting, wouldn't it be art?
Art is a very vague word. This IS art, it's performance art
|
It's a performance she constructed cause she is desperate for attention. That's all music is anymore, so I shouldn't be surprised people haven't vomiting on stage for an extra album to sell already.
People can think art is whatever they want, but when it is a public stunt just to sell their album, it's obvious it's not art.
I swear, Monsters are the type of people on tumblr that post pictures of bruises and blood saying "omg. so beautiful. blood is awesome. YAAAS. If other people think it's art. I must think it's art, too!!!!".
Also, people didn't create art to sell their work. They made art cause they loved it, felt it and wanted people to see it. Not because they wanted their sketch book to sell 3M copies by the end of the year. Vomiting is not art. It is a bodily function. Next, she's gonna **** on stage and y'all are gonna eat it up.