[jomarr]

Originally posted by Tainted Blood

I disagree. You don't need to be talented to influence people. LMFAO are HARDLY talented but they will surely influence some people because of her smash songs.

But you can win awards without talent as well

[Great Username]

Originally posted by Gui Blackout

Singing about teenage romances and fairytales? I don't think so.

You are clearly uneducated on Taylor's music. Your opinion on the subject is therefore irrelevant. Also, please name all the diverse themes Britney's songs had for her first three albums.

[jomarr]

Originally posted by castle13

I'm not here for that influence ****. And your argument ain't even proven. Y'all just assuming that. My fave has a lot of poofs.

WHAT? I'm not even going to argue with this delusional fragment.



Mine too. Do you wanna start?

[UpAllNight]

Originally posted by jomarr

But you can win awards without talent as well

Not 6 Grammys including album of the year .

[Wick]

Come on, let's see some video of Britney dancing lately. Everyone keeps saying she's this amazing dancer, that her talent is dancing, so let's see please.

[CountryFriedChick]

Originally posted by jomarr

But you can win awards without talent as well

This is true in a way especially for fan-voted awards but for the Grammys where you have some of the best producers and songwriters as board members voting on these awards it does make it alot more credible than talking about influence but yes you are right you can win some awards without talent

[Tainted Blood]

Originally posted by jomarr

But you can win awards without talent as well

That's true. But Taylor IS talented.

[jomarr]

Originally posted by CountryFriedChick

No influence does not = talent
now most people who influence are normally talented and I never said Britney wasn't talented but I'm saying that you can influence music without having any talent and I gave examples now the producers for those artists are talented and if Britney does produce than yes she is talented

But awards doesn't equal talent as well. It depends like Influence

[castle13]

Originally posted by EdgeOfAddiction

Has Taylor even attempted to dance?

Many times!

[ifyouseekLEM]

You don't have a 13+ year career with zero talent.

I say Britney. Taylor has talent -- but she's not more talented than Britney.

[Manchs]

I think I'll go with Britney.

[jomarr]

Originally posted by Tainted Blood

That's true. But Taylor IS talented.

I never said she's not. she's the third most played female artist in my last fm

Originally posted by CountryFriedChick

This is true in a way especially for fan-voted awards but for the Grammys where you have some of the best producers and songwriters as board members voting on these awards it does make it alot more credible than talking about influence but yes you are right you can win some awards without talent

I don't think there are credible award giving bodies anymore.

[CountryFriedChick]

Originally posted by jomarr

But awards doesn't equal talent as well. It depends like Influence

This I know that's why I've never mentioned her awards once on here

[EdgeOfAddiction]

Originally posted by castle13

Many times!

The day Taylor turns from a local talent into an international talent like Britney is the day I'll stan for her.

[CaptainMusic]

@WICK

Country music is much deeper than 'LOVE'.

Just a dream, temporary home, She thinks his name was john, the house that built me, fancy and concrete angel are some examples of country songs off the top of my head that are deeper than anything taylor's ever written and not only about love. Most country artists take risks with their music while Taylor doesn't. Again i think she's talented but i don't see her lasting as long as you think she will. Only one female country artist has stayed relevant past 50, and that is reba. Taylor's primary fanbase is made up of little kids and teens, she's gonna need more than songs about boys and fairytales to last in the country genre and i just don't know if she's capable of writing a really deep song like the examples i listed.....

[castle13]

Originally posted by jomarr

WHAT? I'm not even going to argue with this delusional fragment.



Mine too. Do you wanna start?

Uhm yes!

[jomarr]

Originally posted by CountryFriedChick

This I know that's why I've never mentioned her awards once on here

Yup. Well somebody opened that topic.

[Gui Blackout]

I see they can win so they're already appealing to a tired flamebait. WPs will arrive.

Britney remains more talented and globally successful.

[UpAllNight]

Originally posted by CaptainMusic

@WICK

Country music is much deeper than 'LOVE'.

Just a dream, temporary home, She thinks his name was john, the house that built me, fancy and concrete angel are some examples of country songs off the top of my head that are deeper than anything taylor's ever written and not only about love. Most country artists take risks with their music while Taylor doesn't. Again i think she's talented but i don't see her lasting as long as you think she will. Only one female country artist has stayed relevant past 50, and that is reba. Taylor's primary fanbase is made up of little kids and teens, she's gonna need more than songs about boys and fairytales to last in the country genre and i just don't know if she's capable of writing a really deep song like the examples i listed.....

Have you listened to these ???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0dhR5xTMIM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-OQvwYd740

[memi stan]

Brit. She atleast at 1 time could dance. Swift isn't that great in singing or songwriting imo.