[Aurora]

it doesn't matter who she's voting she knows that either way she will lose album buying fans if she declares her support for either hillary or donald

staying unknown is better for her image and sells and that's what she cares about most priority #1

[Feanor]

Originally posted by ReachOut

wow get those menopausal women money

maybe for their children?

On average their children would be in their mid-/early twenties. I think people of that age would buy the album for themselves.

[ElleDriver]

The dramatics in this thread.


The answer is because she can, because she's smart and because she knows both of the candidates are ****ing frauds.

[YouBetterPopBitch]

While I can understand that she doesn't want to tell for who she votes, it's still disappointing that she stays COMPLETELY silent on the subject. I get that it's her choice to not speak about it but still, this election is not like a regular election between Republicans and Democrats.
We have a man who publicly said racist, misogynistics and degrading comments about women and this man could simply become the most powerful man in the world.
Like, she's the one who self-proclaimed herself as a feminist, no one forced her to do so.
This is not about voting for someone because she's a woman, it's about speaking out against someone who disrespected women and is accused of having assaulted women.

Like, she has young fans who look up to her at least, just tell that's it's important to vote, that women have fought to have the right to vote.
Her silent on the whole election, on just the importance that it is to vote, is quite astonishing tbh.
For someone as powerful as her, it's the least she could've done. It's too late now ayway.

[musicman101]

Y'all need to chill. Taylor Swift is an intelligent person and it's a huge reason why she outsells your faves. She wouldn't get as far as she has today if she wasn't smart. Most of her US album sales (like basically 75% of her total sales) are from Middle America and y'all KNOW they would drop her with no hesitation if she supported a liberal candidate, ESPECIALLY in this election. For all of those born in the 2000's, just google DIxie Chicks 2003 and you'll understand why you'd NEVER want to speak against the republican candidate if most of your fanbase is conservative.

She cares about her career way too much to ever speak openly about politics and tbh I think that's just someone using their brain, not a "fake person".... and I hate Taylor Swift's music lmao soooo

[muddysquirrel]

Originally posted by lonnie

It is simple really there's only two possibilities reading your previous post:
1.) Taylor's fanbase is filled with racists she doesn't want to alienate because her opinions are far too liberal for them.
2.) Taylor herself is a Trump supporter and doesn't want backlash for this situation.

When I think of it, possibility no.2 is kinda more probable than 1.

Yes, i think she does not want to lose her republican fans. Nothing wrong with that. Not all of them are racists. Especially people who would be interested in purchasing her albums. She is very career-driven. Friends she keeps clearly suggests she is Democrat, though.

[*.Digambar.*]

I love how you fomos are dictating what she should be doing. her opinion is that POWERFUL huh?

[katykater]

1.

Originally posted by Khal

Is it bringing money into her pocket? Or helping her brand? Nope, so of course she's not speaking.

Hypothetically, If Trump or Hillary mentioned they would support a bill that would limit revenue you get from streams on Apple music, you bet your ass she'll be writing essays.

2. She isn't global and not depending on the US enough to afford offending half of the US. 80% of her money comes from the US. Losing 40% is quite optimistic. In the US she has like 200k pop fans and over a million preexisting country fans from the American South. 80% of her US fans can go Dixie Chicks on her, the ritual burning of her records like they did to the Beatles and CMA can delete any trace of her existence. 0.80 * 0.80 = 0.64 She won't risk losing 64% of her earnings. Proof of globally established is easy to check, can she afford to offend half of the US or not?

[Icannot]

The perFUMES over Her doing nothing.

Why are Her haters in here begging Her to speak up when they've time and time again said that She has no influence or impact over people? 🤔

[Nayke]

She always stays silent, why the surprise.

[Britney Jean]

she's very calculating and scared of the backlash she'll get because of her choice i guess

[azii]

She's probably just scared to lose the support of Trump followers. Which is sad TBH.

[Kingfisher]

look at her hat

[HASHTAGPOW]

she's a well known republic. no need for her to speak up

[JustActinUP]

Not surprising. She's an opportunist. Wouldn't shock me if she's a closet republican.

[Kingfisher]

Originally posted by Kingfisher

look at her hat

oh ****!!!!!!



what_is_the_truth.jpeg

[Qwerty1234]

Originally posted by JustActinUP

Not surprising. She's an opportunist. Wouldn't shock me if she's a closet republican.

She's this generations Michael Jordan. "Republicans buy shoesalbums too."

She's a disgrace. ANYONE OF CONSCIENCE with power to change the mind of a few voters who chooses to remain silent when one choice is a racist, sexist demagogue is a COWARD.

[IamCY]

We all know why.

[Brianna]

You all say that Taylor has no impact but yet you act like her opinion is the most important thing on the planet.

Why does it matter if she hasn't said anything? If a celebrity can change your vote, then you're too young to vote anyway.

[♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚]

Originally posted by katykater

1.


2. She isn't global and not depending on the US enough to afford offending half of the US. 80% of her money comes from the US. Losing 40% is quite optimistic. In the US she has like 200k pop fans and over a million preexisting country fans from the American South. 80% of her US fans can go Dixie Chicks on her, the ritual burning of her records like they did to the Beatles and CMA can delete any trace of her existence. 0.80 * 0.80 = 0.64 She won't risk losing 64% of her earnings. Proof of globally established is easy to check, can she afford to offend half of the US or not?

That's funny because last I checked she sold more copies of 1989 outside of US than some of the other, so-called GLOBAL popstars their total WW sales

The rest of your post makes no sense

Originally posted by Kingfisher

look at her hat

Oh WOW oh WOOOOOW!