To prove libel, you must prove that a statement was objectively, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt false, was knowingly and intentionally false, was made in the presence of actual malice, and that there actually is some form of legal injury. I'm not some dumb kid who hasn't heard of libel before, and I do not see her as having even nearly committed libel. Respectfully disagree with me if you want, argue your case, but don't write me off as a "blind stan" when you have not sufficiently - or really to any extent - demonstrated actual libel on the part of Taylor Swift, and your only argument agains prosecuting Kanye is that you personally think there was reason to not expect privacy and they statute isn't commonly used.
This is the dumbest, silliest discussion ever when neither of them could or would be prosecuted or convicted, and if we're just going to sit here and go back and forth while you call me a "blind stan" instead of having a legitimate and respectful discussion, I'm done here!