Quote:
Originally posted by shinjiikari
you are a hater katy perry is generic anyone who has dr luke produce their songs is generic its obvious he only cares about those coins and would be unwilling to release anything that wont generate a profit theres your proof. Shes generic by default she cant help it shes basically a cash cow.
|
But why do they have to be mutually exclusive? Why can't Katy, like Gaga, make great music that she loves and is proud of, while making a lot of money out of it. That's another issue that annoys people about (some) Gaga stans. That they often act like Gaga is the only one in it for her heart. You can be in it for your heart, produce a lot of great, successful music a long the way, and still make a lot of money as a result of how good that music is. Just because Gaga's music isn't charting as well as it has in the past doesn't mean she cares about her music any more than other artists.
And another "you can't have it both ways": you can't brag about how much money Gaga makes on her tours, and how successful she is and how rich she is, and then call Katy Perry a cash cow. All pop stars are cash cows. That's why their individual net worths are hundreds of millions of dollars.
Just because Katy Perry, Dr Luke and Max Martin make a lot of money making their music doesn't mean they don't care about it, or that they don't care about pop music or don't love making pop music. People don't only care about pop music if they're underperforming. This is another prime example of the hypocrisy (some) monsters exhibit. Lady Gaga is also incredibly profitable and makes huge amounts of money. But you wouldn't call her a cash cow, would you? You'd call her a success. Complete hypocrisy and a complete double standard based in bias.