Quote:
Originally posted by Shinning
I hope no one that has dragged Jay-Z and Tidal in the past agrees with her.
Cause these are the exact same reasons Jay left spotify and created Tidal. And y'all dragged him (still do) for it.
|
LOL.
You don't understand.
Taylor speaking her opinion has to do with the 3 months of no one being paid not underpayment.
She articulates her point to where the GP can not feel threatened or that as she puts it with the epic read not of a spoiled petulant child.
Quote:
Originally posted by Shinning
Spotify paid very badly, Apple isn't paying anything for 3 months.
Taylor speaks against it, ATRL praises it.
Jay-Z speaks against it, creates a service more favorable to all kinds of artists, ATRL drags him.
Predictable.
|
You do understand the difference between a group of millionaires creating a streaming services because they are underpaid on one area and for many in the GP think they are overpaid in many other areas.
vs.
an artist articulating her point of view about not joining yet because no one is getting paid for 3 months.
that said, Jay z did not just speak against it. He and his friends are a part of a company with a failed business model and their execution of their point was grandiose and egotistical. So Jay'z company offers high fidelity sound...was anyone complaining enough about the poor sound of Spotify and Itunes to where there was a mass demand for this? No Do the GP that sees these artists spending millions on frivolous things at time care about them getting more money for streaming when the GP supports their ads/brands (products)/music/touring etc.? No.
I don't see that in Taylor's point and she's not staring a streaming service yet keeping her catalog on the service she complains is ripping her off.
I have a feeling Taylor will wait to see how "fair" apple gets after the 3 month trial and who knows she might have a trick or two up her sleeve.
Could be great for a re-release of 1989 or new material although I like her 2 year album rate