[BoyLikeYouSuxx]

Originally posted by Chemical X.

i'm just copy/pasting what i put on Beatfreak's wall, hopefully this is helpful

Thanks sis, im still shocked that a music chart widely known was basically run by one man who could change it at his own will why exactly do people pay attention to his chart of its so biased?

[D/X]

Originally posted by Katsus Delegend

Will it be called Janiceboard now??

Goodnight.

[SupahBass05]

Originally posted by BoyLikeYouSuxx

Thanks sis, im still shocked that a music chart widely known was basically run by one man who could change it at his own will why exactly do people pay attention to his chart of its so biased?

The chart(s) (BB200 + H100) itself is based on objective data. However, how much radio/sales/streaming are weighted relative to each other is where the subjectivity lies. It's not "biased" in the sense the man or woman in charge says "this is #1 because I say so".

I actually despise the whole genre chart system. PSY getting a Top Rap song was just

[Tom_Ford]

hopefully the genre charts are fixed...

I did appreciate the BEYONCÉ praise.

[Carrie-is-no-1]

Originally posted by Queen_Madonna

Um it has nothing to do with their race darling.

They (as two people) look similar.

It's absolutley ridiclious if I can not say that two people look similar.

They do.

Exactly my point. For you it's difficult to differentiate the features between the two people

[Queen_Madonna]

Originally posted by Carrie-is-no-1

Exactly my point. For you it's difficult to differentiate the features between the two people

It's not, actually.

Just like a white person and a black person can have some different features but still look similar. Two asian people can have different features and still look similar in some ways.

It's actually quite easy for me, to distinguish different features on different people. What's upsetting is that the first place people go to when they someone says two asian people look a like is race. I saw two people.

If anything, the assumption is the race issue here.

But anyways, it's silly to argue about. I won't continue arguing about it. I have clarified for you that It had nothing to do with race. - I don't regret making the comment.

[BobBertran1992]

Originally posted by Queen_Madonna

Umm what is with everyone on here sayingt things like "he's always been connected to us" "He has an ATRL account etc etc"

Don't you guys understand that, that is precisly the problem here. A 40 something year old man talking to pre teens and teenagers about chart position and album releases is part of the reason billboard lost it's integrity.

I couldn't be happier about this. Hopefully in brining integrity back, Miss Minn takes away youtube view counting towards the charts.

She wants to modernise Billboard, so don't be shocked if she makes Google Search count for the charts!

[Carrie-is-no-1]

Originally posted by Queen_Madonna

It's not, actually.

Just like a white person and a black person can have some different features but still look similar. Two asian people can have different features and still look similar in some ways.

It's actually quite easy for me, to distinguish different features on different people. What's upsetting is that the first place people go to when they someone says two asian people look a like is race. I saw two people.

If anything, the assumption is the race issue here.

But anyways, it's silly to argue about. I won't continue arguing about it. I have clarified for you that It had nothing to do with race. - I don't regret making the comment.

You still didn't get my point but alright

[♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚]

I call that #karma
Goodbye Bill

[Beatfreak]

Ugh maybe the good sis Janice will make ATRL threads count towards the Hot 100

[Bwerde]

Originally posted by BoyLikeYouSuxx

wait so the hot 100 isn’t solely based on actual success and performance, but also the biased opinion of just one man??… I never knew this

No. That's insane. It's based on a statistically consistent ratio of streaming, downloads and radio play. My personal biases are unable to affect chart positions, even if I wanted them to. Which I don't.

[Beatfreak]

Originally posted by Katsus Delegend

Will it be called Janiceboard now??

This is pure genius

[Noriega]

In b4 everyone now calls him a flop source after he comes for their fav.
I'm gonna miss him though.. He kept it real even when some weren't able to handle it. Still following him on twitter so I'm good.

[Beatfreak]

Originally posted by Bwerde

No. That's insane. It's based on a statistically consistent ratio of streaming, downloads and radio play. My personal biases are unable to affect chart positions, even if I wanted them to. Which I don't.

Slay Bill. You're better than Billboard.

[MP2K]

Originally posted by Noriega

In b4 everyone now calls him a flop source after he comes for their fav.

They'll drop him quicker than they dropped Gaga. Gotta love the bandwagons.

[Bwerde]

Originally posted by Triton

Yass kick ugly Bill out to the curve!

It's "curb." The saying is "kick someone to the curb."

[Queen_Madonna]

Originally posted by Bwerde

No. That's insane. It's based on a statistically consistent ratio of streaming, downloads and radio play. My personal biases are unable to affect chart positions, even if I wanted them to. Which I don't.

In that case, Im just curious as to the weighting of sales vs youtube views / streaming for lady gaga's promo song "dope"

As I'm sure you're aware it peaked #8 on the hot 100. It did not top any itunes charts or digital sales charts and it did not have an official video on youtube to count towards chart position.

The only thing it did have, was a performance at the youtube awards. Logic says, those views were counted towards the HOT 100 as it peaked at #8.

Did you count an awards shows views towards the charts? if so, how do you jutify that as something that isn't personal bias.

More than happy to admit I am wrong and apologise, but to do so I'm going to need that weighting equation.

[V3$$3L.]

Originally posted by Bwerde

It's "curb." The saying is "kick someone to the curb."

[satellites.™]

Originally posted by Queen_Madonna

In that case, Im just curious as to the weighting of sales vs youtube views / streaming for lady gaga's promo song "dope"

As I'm sure you're aware it peaked #8 on the hot 100. It did not top any itunes charts or digital sales charts and it did not have an official video on youtube to count towards chart position.

The only thing it did have, was a performance at the youtube awards. Logic says, those views were counted towards the HOT 100 as it peaked at #8.

Did you count an awards shows views towards the charts? if so, how do you jutify that as something that isn't personal bias.

Its called STREAMING, now stop asking him dumb questions that you can find the answers to on your own.

[RainDreamer]

Originally posted by Bwerde

No. That's insane. It's based on a statistically consistent ratio of streaming, downloads and radio play. My personal biases are unable to affect chart positions, even if I wanted them to. Which I don't.

Ahh , at least you're still here