Realistically, what could they possibly reveal that would "RUIN" her? Invite a scandal, sure, but "RUIN"?
Exposing marketing methods, shady dealings or contradicting stories isn't going to do much. Haters will simply confirm their feelings, fans will shrug it off and the GP won't care.
Realistically, what could they possibly reveal that would "RUIN" her? Invite a scandal, sure, but "RUIN"?
Exposing marketing methods, shady dealings or contradicting stories isn't going to do much. Haters will simply confirm their feelings, fans will shrug it off and the GP won't care.
A hypothetical revelation that would ruin her would be her using homophobic or racial slurs.
A hypothetical revelation that would ruin her would be her using homophobic or racial slurs.
Why would there be homophobic or racial slurs from her contained within a lawsuit between two other people about something else?
It's possible, but a direct quote from her - presumably taken from an email or text - years ago involving some sort of slur that has direct relevance to whatever this Wendy woman is suing over isn't exactly likely. "Lololol, dumb f*gs, let's exploit them!".
Realistically, what could they possibly reveal that would "RUIN" her? Invite a scandal, sure, but "RUIN"?
Exposing marketing methods, shady dealings or contradicting stories isn't going to do much. Haters will simply confirm their feelings, fans will shrug it off and the GP won't care.
IMHO it can be only something about the artistic input from Lina Morgana into Lady Gaga's early work.
Otherwise, Perez would have most likely exposed Lady Gaga, if it is something about her earlier lifestyle.
What we can say for sure, Lina was talented
you sound ignorant. Did you read the OP?
Quote:
Former Gaga collaborator and close friend Wendy Starland sued Gaga's former BF/producer Rob Fusari in 2010, claiming Fusari screwed her out of revenues she felt she was owed for her role in discovering Gaga.
That has nothing to do with Lina Morgana or whatever you trying (failing) to do right now.
This lawsuit sounds like it's two people arguing over the initial conception and ownership of Lady Gaga from a business POV, not an attempt from Wendy to "expose" their creation. It's pre-Fame, so the hits weren't - or were barely - written yet.
I'd be impressed if this whole time they've managed to pay off and legally silence anyone and everyone involved in her music from the start till now to maintain the illusion she writes her own stuff...
This lawsuit sounds like it's two people arguing over the initial conception and ownership of Lady Gaga from a business POV, not an attempt from Wendy to "expose" their creation. It's pre-Fame, so the hits weren't - or were barely - written yet.
I'd be impressed if this whole time they've managed to pay off and legally silence anyone and everyone involved in her music from the start till now to maintain the illusion she writes her own stuff...
