So she already agreed with intel before the tribute so I dont see what the fuss is about, as far as intel are concerned she was paid to represent them and thats what shes done and lets face it she wouldnt turn down the tribute to someone whos inspired her.
This is also a very weak argument, as if Gaga controls the commercials.(not that it matters)
MAYBE, I'd understand if the Intel logo was plastered on stage or something, but it wasn't. They made the performance possible, they provided the visuals. A behind-the-scenes commercial is harmless and anyone who denies that is delusional.
Disrespectful af especially when the Grammys ignored his best albums but now that they had stuff to sell and were thirsty for ratings they decided they loved him. This should have never been done, or at least it should have been performed by his contemporaries or people he had good relationships with, whom could have really brought justice to his work and legacy.
Agreed. All she and Intel talked about was the technology, they never even talked about Bowie, the process of selecting the songs, his legacy and influence etc.
I wonder if anyone asked Duncan Jones or any member of David Bowie's father if he would have LIKED a tribute in the first place?
Details of his funeral, cremation, were not made public and very little has been said about his passing. It seems to me like he wouldn't have liked all the fuss. It would also explain Duncan's irritation/shade.
And newsflash everyone is trying to sell you something no wonder we have commercials. but what's stupid is that the writer didn't even bother to realize that Intel sponsored the entire event too and this partnership was already in place before Bowie.
Agreed. All she and Intel talked about was the technology, they never even talked about Bowie, the process of selecting the songs, his legacy and influence etc.