Quote:
Originally posted by A Bomb
how quickly we forget. I should have won the testimonial challenge, i lost by one point and was still put up for elimination, because for some bizarre reason my "attitude" was brought up. Even though I literally didn't do or say anything after i quit. But it's cool ya'll can continue to dismiss the issue most people have with this game or ya'll can shake up panel, and balance it a bit.
also idg why you keep bringing Edge up. He literally won Cycle 8 and this is cycle 13! Like wow 1/13 winners wasnt "nice", so that must prove this game is for everyone. This is literally the equivalent of "racism is over bc Obama and Beyoncé". You can miss me with that
|
A Bomb, it's time for some real talk: You didn't lose because of your ****** attitude. You lost because there were better contestants this cycle, with more to contribute to the forum. There's no vast conspiracy about it; you were simply outperformed.
Personality factored into literally one challenge, where you happened to get a few negative critiques about some example posts that came across as more asshole-ish than feisty. It didn't have to be anything more than that. But instead taking those perspectives into consideration and adjusting your approach, or just brushing them off and sticking by the brand you felt confident in, you seem have let it derail you.
Trust me, if there was an abrasive member with the goods—which, again, all of the judges agreed you don't have quite yet—they could win this game. (#abrasivelivesmatter) The problem is contestants who have nothing else to offer but an attitude. One needs more in their arsenal than "I like to be rude to people" to be a top member. Otherwise, what distinguishes them from any old troll?
truth is you were just outperformed.