When did I say that it wasn't that one post and that everybody on here is voting for that reason? stop trying to create arguments out of nowhere.
Nowhere? "I rest my case" pretty heavily implies dismissal of Clinton supporters based upon that statement, and the gender card is something that a lot of Bernie supporters in this thread have already tried to use to dismiss some Clinton supporters' views.
In any case, I didn't say that you were claiming it was everyone on here. Literally nowhere did I say that. I'm pretty sure I'm allowed to point out that the number of people voting for her due to her gender is insignificantly small without somehow also implying you think that it's the exact opposite.
Nowhere? "I rest my case" pretty heavily implies dismissal of Clinton supporters based upon that statement, and the gender card is something that a lot of Bernie supporters in this thread have already tried to use to dismiss some Clinton supporters' views.
In any case, I didn't say that you were claiming it was everyone on here. Literally nowhere did I say that. I'm pretty sure I'm allowed to point out that the number of people voting for her due to her gender is insignificantly small without somehow also implying you think that it's the exact opposite.
No it doesn't, you're fetching for an unnecessary argument that I don't want to be part of.
No it doesn't, you're fetching for an unnecessary argument that I don't want to be part of.
Yes, it does. If you don't want to be a part of discussion or debate on the issue, you don't have to, but if the intent of that post wasn't blatant dismissal because he jokingly said he was voting for her because she's a woman, I have literally no clue what it might be.
Not an argument at all, and certainly no more an unnecessary discussion than the other millions of posts on this public discussion forum.
Yes, it does. If you don't want to be a part of discussion or debate on the issue, you don't have to, but if the intent of that post wasn't blatant dismissal because he jokingly said he was voting for her because she's a woman, I have literally no clue what it might be.
Not an argument at all, and certainly no more an unnecessary discussion than the other millions of posts on this public discussion forum.
It was not blatant dismissal of Clinton supporters, I'm LITERALLY telling you it wasn't. Like, your interpretation is just wrong, it's not true. Again this is an necessary exchange, it's blown out of proportion, there's actually no base to begin with.
Okay Hecking. So what did you mean with this post then? If what Retro is saying isn't true
I'm curious
Stay curious. I'm not going to initiate arguments and play right into the narrative that you guys want me to play into. I made it clear to them that it wasn't a dismissal of Clinton supporters yet they're still persistent assuming they know more about what I'm saying than I do. This is extremely useless and unnecessary. Enough with the conspiracy theories.
Chilling like six hundred feet from the town hall because of my school's biased and ineffective method of ticket distribution / so the guy I lowkey still like can go bc he's the student body president and obvi has to be there but had to work so I'm filling in
I hate the way they spend our tax money, I hate the way they spend our money, the way they give it to Iraq, I mean where they give it to... Iran, the way they give it to ****, everything, they give it to everybody.
Why do Republicans keep looking at their candidates and how well they're polling with Evngelicals, Mailines, Methodists, etc...? Is that a thing? Why don't Democrats do this? (or do they?)
Why do Republicans keep looking at their candidates and how well they're polling with Evngelicals, Mailines, Methodists, etc...? Is that a thing? Why don't Democrats do this? (or do they?)
we do, African Americans, youth vote, Hispanics, blue collar, etc
stop trying to create arguments out of nowhere.
