[Citrus]

PP was a no-brainer for Hill, HRC was debatable. Taking into account her state dept tenure, I can see why they chose Hillary over Bernie.

[Giselle]

People like to act like the Hillary's LGBT rights work begins and ends with marriage.

They like to forget she pushed for gays in the military, spoke out about anti-gay bullying and hate crimes, pushed for gays to be able to adopt, pushed for benefits for gay couples (as FLOTUS/Senator), made an It Gets Better video talking about LGBT suicides, addressed world leaders over gay rights, made it so that trans people could get their genders changed on their passports etc (as SOS). She was HIGHLY praised for her international work regarding LGBT issues.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by Giselle

People like to act like the Hillary's LGBT rights work begins and ends with marriage.

They like to forget she pushed for gays in the military, spoke out about anti-gay bullying and hate crimes, pushed for gays to be able to adopt, pushed for benefits for gay couples (as FLOTUS/Senator), made an It Gets Better video talking about LGBT suicides, addressed world leaders over gay rights, made it so that trans people could get their genders changed on their passports etc (as SOS). She was HIGHLY praised for her international work regarding LGBT issues.

Thank you! So many people LGBTQ Rights people were pissed when same sex marriage was still the big issue in LGBTQ activism because it was hogging the spotlight from other "more important issues", but when it comes to a politician, your past opinion on same sex marriage is the most important part of your policy. Most people evolved on the issue, even Bernie (while he did evolve less than Hillary). So many people were against same-sex marriage and pro-civil unions, it just took time for people to warm up to it. I don't see the fault in that. Just my opinion. I'm gay, but I don't see the point of freaking out over the past. Especially when most people evolved on same sex marriage since 2008.

[BlueTimberwolf]

Hmmm...

But Clinton offered a message that the collected plutocrats found reassuring, according to accounts offered by several attendees, declaring that the banker-bashing so popular within both political parties was unproductive and indeed foolish. Striking a soothing note on the global financial crisis, she told the audience, in effect: We all got into this mess together, and we’re all going to have to work together to get out of it. What the bankers heard her to say was just what they would hope for from a prospective presidential candidate: Beating up the finance industry isn’t going to improve the economy—it needs to stop. And indeed Goldman’s Tim O’Neill, who heads the bank’s asset management business, introduced Clinton by saying how courageous she was for speaking at the bank. (Brave, perhaps, but also well-compensated: Clinton’s minimum fee for paid remarks is $200,000).

This doesn't seem like she was telling them to "cut it out"?

[RatedG²]

I hope Camp Hillary is teaching her supporters how to caucus because it's not pure voting like primaries. It'll come down to organization

[RatedG²]

Trump: "I could shoot somebody and wouldn't lose voters"


OH MY GOD . He's done

edit:

[Latinazza]

Originally posted by RatedG²

Trump: "I could shoot somebody and wouldn't lose voters"


OH MY GOD . He's done

No, he's not

He could defecate on the constitution (broadcast on live t.v.) and his Trumpettes would still follow him blindly. They'd probably say "he's one of us; he's giving a voice to the silent majority."

He will win. Bookmark me.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Latinazza

No, he's not

He could defecate on the constitution (broadcast on live t.v.) and his Trumpettes would still follow him blindly. They'd probably say "he's one of us; he's giving a voice to the silent majority."

He will win. Bookmark me.

I mean idk how to take him down but this isn't good. What if he wins the general?

[BlueTimberwolf]

Well Bill Clinton could rape a dozen women and Hilary could break govt protocol in order to avoid FOIA laws still win the Dem nom, so it goes on on both sides.

[Latinazza]

Originally posted by RatedG²

I mean idk how to take him down but this isn't good. What if he wins the general?

Nothing can take him down. Yesterday he retweeted something from a white supremacist account (White Genocide) and he did not apologize when media exposed him. His followers claimed that this is just the establishment trying to tarnish his image

If he wins the general? I dunno. We're headed down a pretty pathetic path

[BlueTimberwolf]

But he could have used a different analogy that didn't call into the question the intellect of his supporters.

[BlueTimberwolf]

If Hiliary wins the nom and is indicted by the FBI, will Democrats in this thread still vote for her?

[King Maxx]

She won't be indicted.

[Skywalker]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

If Hiliary wins the nom and is indicted by the FBI, will Democrats in this thread still vote for her?

This isn't happening. It's time to move on.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Well Bill Clinton could rape a dozen women and Hilary could break govt protocol in order to avoid FOIA laws still win the Dem nom, so it goes on on both sides.

Timberwolf . And if she's indicted before voting then I wouldn't vote for her. But she's not going to be indicted so it's moot.

Originally posted by Latinazza

Nothing can take him down. Yesterday he retweeted something from a white supremacist account (White Genocide) and he did not apologize when media exposed him. His followers claimed that this is just the establishment trying to tarnish his image

If he wins the general? I dunno. We're headed down a pretty pathetic path

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by King Maxx

She won't be indicted.

But if she is (which is looking more likely by the day) would you still vote for her? Just asking.

[Latinazza]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

If Hiliary wins the nom and is indicted by the FBI, will Democrats in this thread still vote for her?

[RatedG²]

9 members and 9 guests. The ratings are back

[King Maxx]

IF (she's not so I'm not even worried) she is, then she has no shot at winning. I won't vote for the Republican tho. I will really leave the US if Trump/Cruz is president.

But this is weird because what would happen tho if she was indicted in the middle of the general election? Is she eliminated? Does that automatically make the Rep nom the winner? Would her VP choice take the spot? Does the person that came in 2nd take her spot (Bernie of course)? Cuz if that could happen then I'm voting for him. This just leads to a big ol crisis which is why if they don't indict her within the next 2 months and she wins, then they'll just drop it all together.

[RatedG²]

Her past is flaw free though