Can I finally put some trust in Li to not **** up a 3-0 lead or do I still need to worry? . I need advice
ESPNTennis @ESPNTennis 15m
In 27 of last 29 Slam finals on women’s side, the winner of 1st set has ended up winning the title - the only 2 exceptions have been Li Na.
ESPNTennis @ESPNTennis 15m
In 27 of last 29 Slam finals on women’s side, the winner of 1st set has ended up winning the title - the only 2 exceptions have been Li Na.
ESPNTennis @ESPNTennis 15m
In 27 of last 29 Slam finals on women’s side, the winner of 1st set has ended up winning the title - the only 2 exceptions have been Li Na.
ESPNTennis @ESPNTennis 15m
In 27 of last 29 Slam finals on women’s side, the winner of 1st set has ended up winning the title - the only 2 exceptions have been Li Na.
She has variety? Radwanska has variety, Stosur has variety,Vinci has variety, heck even Azarenka has more variety than Li Na. And it would be for the best to keep Serena out of it, we all know she's untouchable, variety or not.
She used to be a ball basher before Carlos I agree. but now she's added a lot of good net play. But yeah she has one of the games with the least variety out of the top players. Still good enough to beat everyone except Serena when Li is playing her best
She used to be a ball basher before Carlos I agree. but now she's added a lot of good net play. But yeah she has one of the games with the least variety out of the top players. Still good enough to beat everyone except Serena when Li is playing her best
. I need advice
