Quote:
i don't think so its an unnecessary drama well we should just move on and concentrate on next round instead of mourning on past round
|
I would not have been bothered if this was a petty thing,
but it is serious here and this is being pointed by other players as well,
as seen in previous posts.
Let me do a follow-up to my case.
When Regina George won Immunity in the first round, she asked:
Quote:
Originally posted by Regina George
So I have to send a picture? 
|
And the host made it clear that:
Quote:
Originally posted by Strangergab
It's your decision, would only be for show, because the judges did not qualify your photo
|
This was CLEAR that Immunity players had the CHOICE to send in
a picture, but the picture would not be counted or is not for qualification,
and it would be just for fun.
Up until now, no rule had been changed regarding Immunity players.
If we had been informed that we would be awarded points regarding
our entries, all Immunity players would have sent an entry just to have
a shot at Immunity again.
Since no rules were changed, why should we agree to this unfair decision now?
This is nothing against you Middle Of Selena. My argument
would have been the same if it was anybody, because I just
don't think this is fair.
No one had been notified about this, and if the host wants to make
it a new rule as from next round that Immunity players can submit again AND can be immunised again,
I will have no problem with that.
This has been among my favorite games so far, but
I am sorry, I don't think I will have further interest in this game
if someone else doesn't win Immunity.