Quote:
Originally posted by swissman
This image is an example of how to have someone rest themselves on another person without it looking problematic. This is not an example of a double standard, since the standard is different in both.
In the problem image, the black girl is the ONLY black girl, and she's the only girl doing nothing, she's also singled out already by shirt colour. In this image there are 3 white girls and the one being balanced on is posing along with it, spreading her legs out, and being not just an object but a subject.
|
You are outrageous. Why does it seem necessary or feasible that every detail of the photograph connotes some sort of racial undertone or discriminatory agenda? It is far more reasonable to think that the photographer just had a vision of an aesthetic in mind in either photo, not that he or she was trying to promote some sort of racist agenda. Do you think Gap would risk their publicity (and by association profits) by doing something like this? They should not have to pander to every hypersensitive SJW like you, and it's ludicrous that they are receiving any type of backlash for the photograph.
Honestly, it's infuriating that SJWs waste their time and energy on these absolutely meaningless and insignificant problems, when there are POC in countries
outside the Western world that are going through
actual injustice that is far,
far worse than trivial ideas such as whether or not white people can wear dreadlocks.
The SJWs need stop asserting institutionalized racism where it doesn't exist, as their efforts are better spent trying to prevent people from being raped and killed in Africa and South America, as opposed to policing such meaningless things like the composition of a single photograph.
Ridiculous.