@ all this mess. anyway, is she pregnant? its not the best moment for her to have a kid right now, she is always with new boyfriend and everything. That kid will meet a lot of stepfathers.
She needs to learn what feminism is first. Tearing down other FEMALE singers for "stealing" 2 back-up dancers, writing about people in a negative light in ALL your albums, and having a 50+ people PR team sure ain't "feminism".
People acting like Calvin Harris wouldn't be referred to as 'Taylor Swift's rumoured boyfriend'
Right? Men get referred to as women's boyfriends/husbands too in magazines if the woman they're in a relationship with is famous too, so it's kind of got nothing to do with feminism.
I think she just gets way too defensive over these things because she knows the reputation she has of being a serial dater and it seriously bothers her
@ all this mess. anyway, is she pregnant? its not the best moment for her to have a kid right now, she is always with new boyfriend and everything. That kid will meet a lot of stepfathers.
@ all this mess. anyway, is she pregnant? its not the best moment for her to have a kid right now, she is always with new boyfriend and everything. That kid will meet a lot of stepfathers.
She needs to learn what feminism is first. Tearing down other FEMALE singers for "stealing" 2 back-up dancers, writing about people in a negative light in ALL your albums, and having a 50+ people PR team sure ain't "feminism".
Having a little fun and getting back at someone who tried to tear down your career doesn't make her any less of a feminist. Putting this into your work as a subliminal message, instead of coming out and slandering Kathryn Hudson, has nothing to do with "going against feminism". Don't discredit what you don't understand.
She's referring to the way the magazine labelling her as "HARRY'S EX" and "CALVIN'S rumored GF"
But she was commenting on the headline, NOT the body of the article. No blast on feminism in the title. Taylor is incorrect.
Quote:
Originally posted by castle13
I have yet to see one of them define feminism with their posts
No one needs to as it is such a blatantly obvious concept these days. All the more reason why Taylor's choice of words were more misleading than OK Magazine's.
Definitely not tearing another woman apart in public, there's no need to go into definitions to know that she's anything but a feminist.
Anyway it's just a silly tweet, I guess that happens when she has to tweet something that's hasn't been planned by her team 3 months in advance.
Feminism doesn't take away a woman's right to feel betrayed and not express how she feels about someone who does her wrong
And your 2nd paragraph. You're really trying it. And being known for not liking her is not helping your cause but stay perched in every Taylor thread I guess
Chris Pratt tea
