Also, some of you need to be a little more educated on how epidemiological studies work. They only show factual correlations in populations, NOT a cause-and-effect relationship.
Uneducated people comparing mutilation to circumcision. What a disgrace
This is a great example of how BOTH religion and science advocate male circumcision for health benefits.
Circumcision is mutilation. No matter what way you look at it, that's what it is. You're removing a natural body part, how on earth is that not mutilation?
Circumcision is mutilation. No matter what way you look at it, that's what it is. You're removing a natural body part, how on earth is that not mutilation?
cutting your nail is mutilation? or hair cut? or epilation?
Circumcision is mutilation. No matter what way you look at it, that's what it is. You're removing a natural body part, how on earth is that not mutilation?
Not the way people here are describing it--likening it to some practice that leaves a psychological scar on those who receive unforced, non-consent mutilation.
Thank god I don't have prostate cancer and still have all the nerve endings on my dick so I can actually feel something when I masturbate and eventually have sex!
Why are people turning this into cut vs uncut lol? Is it really that big a deal? There's pros and cons to both and certain people prefer one over the other. As long as you're happy with yourself who cares