But thats her personal list mine for example is different
i know but when u make a list of _____ of all time, a debate and critisism is expected.... cause iat the end we try to figure out which people should be on that list... it doesnt say favorite (which is clearly an oppinion) its says most famous...
It's hard to find a globally most known, though, as it varies depends on the location. For Americans, I think it must be George Washington, but for Europeans and Asians, probably it's another.
i know but when u make a list of _____ of all time, a debate and critisism is expected.... cause iat the end we try to figure out which people should be on that list... it doesnt say favorite (which is clearly an oppinion) its says most famous...
yeah i agree but again its her personal list so its an opinion and of course we are here to debate
Another one of your messy "all time" lists. Why do you have to quantify things like that?
It's hard to know who Shakespeare is, but not to know who Da Vinci is at the same time.
Or to know of Hitler, but not of Caesar. Sorry, but the whole list is
Things like these should be done in Tiers, not in Lists.
Yeah but she's famous, or well known, today
Lots of people's status is increased after death, you can use modern day examples of this too ala Heath Ledger, Paul Walker etc.
Neither of them are the most famous men of all time. Anne Frank was an average girl in an extraordinary circumstance. No disrespect to her, but I don't think shes one of the most famous people of all time.
