It's the same thing as the 5 but with a bigger battery. How is it worse
Quote:
Wall Street Journal: “While the 5C looks and feels very familiar, it’s still a good phone and an improvement over the 5. But its improvements are evolutionary, not revolutionary.”
CNET: “The iPhone 5C will be a far more appealing phone for kids: it seems less fragile, warmer, even simpler. It feels like an iPod: even the side volume rocker buttons are more elongated and iPod Touch-like.”
AnandTech: “For all intents and purposes it is a perfect replacement for the iPhone 5. If you were planning on buying a cost reduced iPhone 5 once the 5s came out, the iPhone 5c should have no problems filling that role. Its performance, battery life and camera quality are all on par with the 5.”
Engadget: “The iPhone 5c is gorgeous — we'd even argue that it's the most beautiful iPhone since the 4 and 4s. It instantly makes the iPhone 5 and 5s look staid in comparison.”
TechCrunch: "Given the choice, I’d choose an iPhone 5c over an iPhone 5, based on design alone, and ignoring its other benefits."
It's worse because you're getting a new phone but you're actually using last year/old technology.
Money NOT well spent.
But it's NOT worse than the phone so I'm still not understanding your point Millions of phones sell world-wide with 3 year old technology so im not sure of the problem. You cant say something's worse and then give a completely detached reason.
But it's NOT worse than the phone so I'm still not understanding your point Millions of phones sell world-wide with 3 year old technology so im not sure of the problem. You cant say something's worse and then give a completely detached reason.
sis, the Price
The Price
PRICE
The iphone 5c is the plastic version of the iphone 5 that was out a YEAR AGO with the same EXPENSIVE price tag.
Most phones with 3 year old tech sold about 1/5th the price of the 5C.
You would be a dumbass to even consider buying the iphone 5c (no offense)